Die folgenden Links führen aus den jeweiligen lokalen Bibliotheken zum Volltext:
Alternativ können Sie versuchen, selbst über Ihren lokalen Bibliothekskatalog auf das gewünschte Dokument zuzugreifen.
Bei Zugriffsproblemen kontaktieren Sie uns gern.
49 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Edition Politik 45
Frontmatter -- Contents -- Acknowledgements -- Introduction: A Time to Think and Act Differently? -- Chapter 1: From the Truth about Politics to the Politics of Truth -- Chapter 2: Truth and Power -- Chapter 3: Learning to Resist -- Chapter 4: The Militant Subject of a Political Truth -- Chapter 5: Resistance in Control Societies -- Conclusion: How to Think and Act Differently -- Bibliography
In: Edition Politik, v. 45
`The truth will set you free' is a maxim central to both theories and practices of resistance. Nonetheless, it is a claim that has come under fire from an array of critical perspectives in the second half of the 20th century. Iain MacKenzie analyses two of the most compelling of these perspectives: the poststructuralist politics of truth formulated by Michel Foucault and Gilles Deleuze and the alternative post-foundational account of truth and militancy developed by Alain Badiou. He argues that a critically oriented version of poststructuralism provides both an understanding of the deeply entwined nature of truth and power and a compelling account of the creative practices that may sustain resistance.
In: European political science: EPS, Band 17, Heft 4, S. 670-677
ISSN: 1682-0983
This paper defends the claim that the critique of ideology requires creative interventions in the symbolic order of society and that those creative interventions must be understood as events. This is what animates the work of both Ricoeur and Deleuze and yet helps to uncover the fundamental difference between them regarding the conditions that make such critique possible: a difference regarding how we understand the nature of events. While Ricoeur is the philosopher of the narrated event, Deleuze is the philosopher of the dramatic event. Instead of pursuing a point-by-point comparison of their respective philosophies of the event, a line of social and political inquiry is constructed that leads from Ricoeur to Deleuze with a view to establishing at what point these two thinkers take different paths. It will be argued that the crossroads is rather neatly signposted by Meillassoux's critique of strong correlationism in After Finitude.
BASE
In: Contemporary political theory: CPT, Band 10, Heft 4, S. 511-513
ISSN: 1476-9336
In: Contemporary political theory: CPT, Band 10, Heft 4, S. 511-513
ISSN: 1470-8914
In: The RUSI journal: publication of the Royal United Services Institute for Defence and Security Studies, Band 148, Heft 6, S. 70-72
ISSN: 1744-0378
In: Theoria: a journal of social and political theory, Heft 101, S. 124-125
ISSN: 0040-5817
In: Contemporary political theory: CPT, Band 1, Heft 1, S. 133-134
ISSN: 1476-9336
In: Contemporary political theory: CPT, Band 1, Heft 1, S. 133-134
ISSN: 1470-8914
In: Journal of political ideologies, Band 6, Heft 3, S. 331-345
ISSN: 1469-9613
In: Theoria: a journal of social and political theory, Heft 98, S. 104-105
ISSN: 0040-5817
In: Journal of political ideologies, Band 6, Heft 3, S. 331
ISSN: 1356-9317
In: Critical review of international social and political philosophy: CRISPP, Band 3, Heft 4, S. 1-24
ISSN: 1743-8772