Search results

Oral hygiene and oral health are a major concern for long‐term‐care facility residents who are unable to care for themselves. In this six‐week study, the efficacy of a sonic toothbrush (Sonicare®) was compared with traditional manual brushing in a setting where hygiene care was provided by caregivers. Evaluations of plaque levels were made at baseline and at 2, 4, and 6 weeks according to the Silness and Löe index. The sonic brush was found to be significantly superior to the manual brush over the trial period (MANCOVA; p = 0.026). Plaque reduction at 6 weeks was found to be 38% with the sonic brush and 6% with the manual brush. The results indicate that the sonic brush may be an effective way to provide improved oral health to nursing home subjects when oral care is caregiver‐provided.

AbstractThis study reports findings from a survey of dental fear in a special needs dental clinic population. Subjects were recruited from the University of Washington's Dental Education in Care of Persons With Disabilities (DECOD) clinical program (n = 132). Dental fears were assessed using the Kleinknecht Dental Report. Fear levels were examined among patients with differing categories of primary disabilities and between genders, races and educational levels. Some level of dental fear was reported by 43.2% of the respondents, indicating that dental fear may be an important factor in dental care for this population. Gender and educational level were significantly associated with fear levels (both p < 0.05). Significant differences in fear levels were found between individuals with differing classes of disability. Accompanying caregivers also were interviewed (n=72) to allow for a comparison of patient and caregiver perceptions. Both patient and caregiver were interviewed whenever possible to create paired reports. Generally, caregivers significantly overestimated fear levels compared with patients (p < 0.01). However, when scores were compared in matched caregiver‐patient analyses, the fear scores were not significantly different, indicating that caregivers accurately estimated their client's level of dental fear. A regression model including disability group, gender, and years of education was significant for predicting fear level as measured by the Kleinknecht survey (p= 0.02). We conclude that dental fear may be a significant, though little understood problem for a population of persons with disabilities as well as for their oral care providers, and that further investigation is needed.

ABSTRACTThe Academy of Dentistry for the Handicapped and the American Association of Hospital Dentists have developed and approved guidelines to train residents in general practice residency programs on dental care for the patient with special needs. These proposed guidelines are intended to prepare the general practice resident to have a broad degree of involvement with the physical, emotional, and psychological issues faced by the patients with mild to severe disabling conditions. Didactic and clinical objectives are presented for 12 content areas of clinical practice.

A survey of incoming dental school patients compared 64 adult patients (DECOD) and 73 patients without disability (ND), regarding past dental experience, current needs, and basis for selecting the school's clinics. The responses indicated that, for DECOD patients, clinic selection was based largely on Medicaid acceptance, staff experience, and inability of other dentists to manage their disability; for ND patients, selection was based on lower fee structure. Both groups expressed high treatment need, but the rate was lower for DECOD than for ND patients. More DECOD patients reported severe dental anxiety and adverse effects of dental problems on general health. Chart records revealed that clinical findings exceeded perceived need for both DECOD and ND patients. While both groups had high periodontal disease rates (91%), DECOD patients had significantly poorer oral hygiene and less restorative need than ND patients. The findings suggest differences between persons with disabilities and other patient groups in difficulty of access to dental services in the community, reasons for entering the dental school system, and in presenting treatment need and/or treatment planning.

This study compared oral health and demographic characteristics of patients with and without disabilities at a dental school emergency clinic. Of 407 consecutive patients surveyed, 20.4% reported disabilities. Two groups matched by age and gender, those with disabilities (DIS, n = 79) and those without disabilities (ND, n = 177), were compared on questionnaire responses; two subgroups, DIS (n = 38) and ND (n = 44), were assessed clinically. The mean ages of the DIS and ND groups were 44.0 years (SD ± 11.6) and 43.0 years (SD ± 12.3), respectively. By chi‐squared analysis, DIS vs. ND subjects had significantly lower levels of education, employment, income, and dental Insurance, and greater dependence on Government funding. In the DIS group, 79.5% were not working, while 6.4% did work regularly. In the ND group, the corresponding values were 30.9% and 46.9%, respectively. In the DIS group, 51.9% identified Medicaid acceptance as the reason they sought care at the clinic, while 62, 7% of the subjects In the ND group identified the lower fee structure as the reason for clinic selection. More DIS than ND subjects reported dentists' unavailability and inability to manage the disability, lack of transportation, effect of dental problems on health, and referral by a health professional. DIS vs. ND subjects had significantly fewer sound teeth and more missing teeth. The results suggest that one in five dental school emergency clinic patients has disabilities.

Evolutionary processes, including selection, can be indirectly inferred based on patterns of genomic variation among contemporary populations or species. However, this often requires unrealistic assumptions of ancestral demography and selective regimes. Sequencing ancient DNA from temporally spaced samples can inform about past selection processes, as time series data allow direct quantification of population parameters collected before, during, and after genetic changes driven by selection. In this Comment and Opinion, we advocate for the inclusion of temporal sampling and the generation of paleogenomic datasets in evolutionary biology, and highlight some of the recent advances that have yet to be broadly applied by evolutionary biologists. In doing so, we consider the expected signatures of balancing, purifying, and positive selection in time series data, and detail how this can advance our understanding of the chronology and tempo of genomic change driven by selection. However, we also recognize the limitations of such data, which can suffer from postmortem damage, fragmentation, low coverage, and typically low sample size. We therefore highlight the many assumptions and considerations associated with analyzing paleogenomic data and the assumptions associated with analytical methods. ; This work resulted from a synthesis and writing retreat as part of ADAPT (Ancient DNA studies of Adaptive Processes through Time) Special Topic Network generously funded by the European Society for Evolutionary Biology (ESEB). ADF was supported by European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under the Marie Skłodowska‐Curie grant agreement No. 663830. ASM was supported by a European Research Council (ERC) grant. LD and MD acknowledge fudning from the Swedish Research Coucil (VR grant 2017‐04647)

Homotherium was a genus of large-bodied scimitar-toothed cats, morphologically distinct from any extant felid species, that went extinct at the end of the Pleistocene [1–4]. They possessed large, saber-form serrated canine teeth, powerful forelimbs, a sloping back, and an enlarged optic bulb, all of which were key characteristics for predation on Pleistocene megafauna [5]. Previous mitochondrial DNA phylogenies suggested that it was a highly divergent sister lineage to all extant cat species [6–8]. However, mitochondrial phylogenies can be misled by hybridization [9], incomplete lineage sorting (ILS), or sex-biased dispersal patterns [10], which might be especially relevant for Homotherium since widespread mito-nuclear discrepancies have been uncovered in modern cats [10]. To examine the evolutionary history of Homotherium, we generated a 7x nuclear genome and a 38x exome from H. latidens using shotgun and target-capture sequencing approaches. Phylogenetic analyses reveal Homotherium as highly divergent (22.5 Ma) from living cat species, with no detectable signs of gene flow. Comparative genomic analyses found signatures of positive selection in several genes, including those involved in vision, cognitive function, and energy consumption, putatively consistent with diurnal activity, well-developed social behavior, and cursorial hunting [5]. Finally, we uncover relatively high levels of genetic diversity, suggesting that Homotherium may have been more abundant than the limited fossil record suggests [3, 4, 11–14]. Our findings complement and extend previous inferences from both the fossil record and initial molecular studies, enhancing our understanding of the evolution and ecology of this remarkable lineage. ; This project received funding from the European Union's Seventh Framework Programme for Research, Technological Development, and Demonstration under grant agreement no. FP7-PEOPLE-2011-IEF-298820 and ERC Consolidator Award 681396—Extinction Genomics to M.T.P.G. Portions of this manuscript were prepared while W.E.J. held a National Research Council Research Associateship Award at the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research (WRAIR).