Will the Scandinavian Model Collapse? The Perspective of European Integration
In: Futures: the journal of policy, planning and futures studies, Band 28, Heft 5, S. 471
ISSN: 0016-3287
472 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Futures: the journal of policy, planning and futures studies, Band 28, Heft 5, S. 471
ISSN: 0016-3287
In: Issues & studies: a social science quarterly on China, Taiwan, and East Asian affairs, Band 32, Heft 1, S. 57-88
ISSN: 1013-2511
World Affairs Online
In: The European legacy: the official journal of the International Society for the Study of European Ideas (ISSEI), Band 28, Heft 8, S. 903-906
ISSN: 1470-1316
SSRN
In: The European legacy: the official journal of the International Society for the Study of European Ideas (ISSEI), Band 28, Heft 2, S. 155-172
ISSN: 1470-1316
In: Environmental science and pollution research: ESPR, Band 30, Heft 4, S. 10165-10178
ISSN: 1614-7499
In: The European legacy: the official journal of the International Society for the Study of European Ideas (ISSEI), Band 23, Heft 6, S. 674-691
ISSN: 1470-1316
In: Journal of Comparative Economics, Band 46, Heft 4
SSRN
Working paper
In: Journal of Chinese political science, Band 23, Heft 1, S. 105-120
ISSN: 1874-6357
In: Social science quarterly, Band 98, Heft 5, S. 1468-1486
ISSN: 1540-6237
ObjectiveIs there a tradeoff between democratization and stability? This article investigates this question through a typological analysis of the "third‐wave" countries. Specifically, it addresses two issues. First, are there more countries losing stability than gaining it after democratization? Second, between the "stability losers" and "stability gainers," which camp has experienced a larger scale of change?MethodsThis article adopts both data set matching and case knowledge. By matching data sets on democratization (Polity IV) and violence episodes (Major Episodes of Political Violence), as well as by bringing in case knowledge, this study categorizes the third‐wavers into three groups (the stability losers, the gainers, and the no‐changers) and compares their proportion as well as scale of change.ResultsThis study discovers that, among the 108 "third‐wavers," the ratio of "stability gainers," "no‐changers," and "stability losers" is 36:45:27. The scale of change is also bigger among the stability gainers than among the losers. Particularly, the chance of very bloody conflicts is much bigger under authoritarianism than after democratic transition.ConclusionWhile a level of caution for democratization is healthy, this topological analysis suggests a more balanced view. Democratization can be dangerous. The resistance to it can also be, if not more so.
In: The European legacy: the official journal of the International Society for the Study of European Ideas (ISSEI), Band 22, Heft 2, S. 237-239
ISSN: 1470-1316
SSRN
Working paper
In: Journal of Chinese governance, Band 1, Heft 3, S. 506-519
ISSN: 2381-2354
In: The European legacy: the official journal of the International Society for the Study of European Ideas (ISSEI), Band 20, Heft 3, S. 224-238
ISSN: 1470-1316
In: The European legacy: the official journal of the International Society for the Study of European Ideas (ISSEI), Band 19, Heft 6, S. 803-805
ISSN: 1470-1316