Privatizing rural China: insider privatization, innovative contracts and the performance of township enterprises
In: The China quarterly: an international journal for the study of China, Heft 176, S. 981-1005
ISSN: 0305-7410, 0009-4439
88 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: The China quarterly: an international journal for the study of China, Heft 176, S. 981-1005
ISSN: 0305-7410, 0009-4439
World Affairs Online
In: Economic Development and Cultural Change, Band 58, Heft 1, S. 173-176
ISSN: 1539-2988
In: Journal of population economics: international research on the economics of population, household, and human resources, Band 38, Heft 1
ISSN: 1432-1475
In: Economic Development and Cultural Change, Band 70, Heft 3, S. 981-1016
ISSN: 1539-2988
SSRN
SSRN
In: 21st Century China Center Research Paper No. 2017-07
SSRN
Working paper
In: The journal of human resources, Band 44, Heft 4, S. 890-915
ISSN: 1548-8004
In: Journal of development economics, Band 75, Heft 1, S. 1-26
ISSN: 0304-3878
In: The China quarterly, Band 176, S. 981-1005
ISSN: 1468-2648
This article examines the privatization of China's township enterprises. According to our survey of 670 firms in 15 randomly selected counties in Jiangsu and Zhejiang provinces, more than half of the firms owned by local government were completely privatized by 1999. The privatization process is striking for two reasons. First, local governments almost always sold firms to insiders, while in the rest of the world privatization largely involves outsiders. Secondly, unlike the predictions of some academics and policy makers, many privatized firms have experienced an increase in performance. Drawing on firm-level survey data and extensive interviews with government leaders and managers, we found that leaders devised a way to elicit information from the buyer at the time of the sale about the firm's future profitability that enabled them to execute privatization successfully. Our analysis shows that the performance of firms with new owners that paid a price for the firm that exceeded the book value of its assets is on par with the performance of private firms after privatization since they also received strong incentives.
In: The China quarterly: an international journal for the study of China, Heft 176, S. 981-1005
ISSN: 0305-7410, 0009-4439
SSRN
Working paper
In: Journal of Public Economics, Band 89, Heft 9-10, S. 1743-1762
SSRN
In: HELIYON-D-24-41335
SSRN
This paper studies insider privatization in transition economies. We show theoretically that the underperformance of insider-privatized firms could be due to the manager-cum-owner's lack of incentives after privatization. A screening theory predicts that a firm's postprivatization incentives increase with the firm's buyout price. The empirical results show that the buyout price decreases with the degree of information asymmetry and that a firm's postprivatization performance increases with the buyout price. We also find that the performance of premium-paying firms converges with that of private firms after privatization; in contrast, heavily discounted firms perform indistinguishably from government-owned firms.
BASE