Die "Besonderheiten des öffentlichen Rechts"
In: Die Personalvertretung: PersV : Fachzeitschrift des gesamten Personalwesens für Personalvertretungen und Dienststellen, Heft 1
ISSN: 1866-0185, 1868-7857
9 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Die Personalvertretung: PersV : Fachzeitschrift des gesamten Personalwesens für Personalvertretungen und Dienststellen, Heft 1
ISSN: 1866-0185, 1868-7857
In: Die Personalvertretung: PersV : Fachzeitschrift des gesamten Personalwesens für Personalvertretungen und Dienststellen, Heft 9
ISSN: 1866-0185, 1868-7857
In: Transfer: the European review of labour and research ; quarterly review of the European Trade Union Institute, Band 28, Heft 1, S. 47-64
ISSN: 1996-7284
Europe has been faced with multiple challenges during the COVID-19 pandemic, including the problem of how to secure jobs and earnings. In our comparative analysis, we explore to what degree European welfare states were capable of responding to this crisis by stabilising employment and workers' incomes. While short-time work was a policy tool already partly used in the 2008/2009 Great Recession, job retention policies were further expanded or newly introduced across Europe in 2020 in the wake of the pandemic. However, cross-national variations persist in the way in which these schemes were designed and implemented across European welfare states, aiming more or less to hoard labour and thereby avoid mass dismissals throughout the employment crisis. We distinguish between business support and labour support logics in explaining the variation in job retention policies across Europe. Our finding is that Continental, Mediterranean and liberal welfare states did more to foster labour hoarding using short-time work than Nordic or Central and Eastern European countries.
In: IZA Discussion Paper No. 16088
SSRN
In: European policy analysis: EPA, Band 8, Heft 3, S. 297-311
ISSN: 2380-6567
AbstractOur analysis asks whether the pandemic situation affects welfare state support in Germany. The pandemic has increased the health and income risks calling for welfare state intervention. While increased needs, more deservingness, and higher state responsibility during such a crisis would suggest augmented support generally and among those at risk, this might be a short‐term effect and cost considerations could reverse this trend. We study public attitudes towards four key social policy areas based on the German Internet Panel (GIP). We use three waves prior and further three waves since the pandemic had been declared in March 2020. The analysis shows both continuity in the popularity of social policies, in particular health and pensions, and some short‐term increase in support for unemployment and family policies. The results after nearly 2 years suggest rather continuation with some thermostatic short‐term boosts in support instead of any long‐lasting change.
In: IZA Discussion Paper No. 16874
SSRN
In: Momentum Quarterly: Zeitschrift für sozialen Fortschritt, Band 10, Heft 1, S. 1
ISSN: 2226-5538
In: IZA Discussion Paper No. 17323
SSRN
In: Momentum Quarterly: Zeitschrift für sozialen Fortschritt, Band 9, Heft 1, S. 1
ISSN: 2226-5538