Long-term leaching and mechanical behaviour at recycled aggregate with different gypsum contents
In: Environmental science and pollution research: ESPR, Band 26, Heft 35, S. 35565-35573
ISSN: 1614-7499
9 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Environmental science and pollution research: ESPR, Band 26, Heft 35, S. 35565-35573
ISSN: 1614-7499
In: Environmental science and pollution research: ESPR, Band 27, Heft 1, S. 125-132
ISSN: 1614-7499
In: Environmental science and pollution research: ESPR, Band 28, Heft 19, S. 24441-24454
ISSN: 1614-7499
In: Environmental science and pollution research: ESPR, Band 31, Heft 31, S. 44023-44035
ISSN: 1614-7499
AbstractNowadays, all productive sectors, including the construction industry, are facing the challenge of reducing their environmental impact. To achieve this objective, numerous actions are being carried out to access greater levels of environmental and economic sustainability. Techniques as Life Cycle Assessment contribute to quantifying environmental impacts, promoting a circular economy in a sector that consumes a high volume of resources, materials, and energy while generating large amounts of gaseous, liquid, or solid emissions. The present study aims to deepen our understanding of aspects that demonstrate the benefits of using RA instead of natural aggregates. This study not only quantifies the environmental impact but also explores the effects of potential improvements in the productive system and their impact on reducing environmental harm. The Life Cycle Assessment methodology is applied to quantify and compare the environmental impacts generated in the production of a ton of mixed recycled aggregates (MRA) from construction and demolition wastes, based on the data provided by plant managers. This is compared to the environmental impacts generated in the production of one ton of natural aggregates extracted from a quarry. The results revealed that the production of mixed recycled aggregate is more environmentally beneficial, confirming a reduction of 70.66% in environmental impacts during the production of recycled aggregates, in comparison to the natural aggregates extraction. Furthermore, the economic analysis demonstrates the economic advantage since the cost of producing recycled aggregates is over 30% cheaper than natural aggregates, being more competitive even when the transportation distances from the plant to the work sites exceed those of natural aggregates.
Graphical Abstract
In: JEMA-D-23-03251
SSRN
Construction and demolition waste consists approximately of one third waste generated in the European Union. The recycling of this stream waste will provide ecological and sustainable benefits. Recycled aggregates from construction and demolition waste are clearing a path into civil constructions, as substitutes for natural aggregates. The possible applications of recycled aggregates on infrastructure construction projects will depend on the quality of the recycled aggregates mainly. This will be determined by the nature and the origin of the construction and demolition waste, and the treatment system undergone. Hence, this work proposes recommendations for the handling of construction and demolition waste in treatment plants.
BASE
In: Environmental science and pollution research: ESPR, Band 25, Heft 36, S. 36014-36023
ISSN: 1614-7499
In: Environmental science and pollution research: ESPR, Band 25, Heft 36, S. 36024-36034
ISSN: 1614-7499
In: Environmental science and pollution research: ESPR, Band 31, Heft 12, S. 17690-17705
ISSN: 1614-7499