Suchergebnisse

The linking of age and ill-health is part of a cultural narrative of decline as age is often defined as the absence of good health. Research has shown that we are aged by culture, but we are also culturally made ill when we age. The cultural ambiguity of aging can thus deconstruct negative images of old age as physical decrepitude. This volume investigates the topic of health within the matrix of time and experience by addressing issues such as how our understanding of health influences our notion of agency within a subversive deconstruction of normative age concepts, and what role the notion of health plays in such an interaction.

The binary construction of »young± and »old±, which is based on a biogerontological model of aging as decline, can be redefined as the ambiguity of aging from a cultural studies perspective. This concept enables an analysis of the social functions of images of aging with the aim of providing a basis for interdisciplinary exchange on gerontological research. The articles in this publication conceive the relationship between living and aging as a productive antagonism which focuses on the interplay between continuity and change as a marker of life course identity: aging and growing older are pro.

The discourse of positive aging has become the central plank upon which international and national aging policies are constructed. Moreover, an increasing number of popular writers are advocating positive aging as a means to age actively, successively, and productively. These include authors of self-help books, media personalities, as well as writers from psychology and the social sciences As many gerontologists point out, rationales supporting positive aging convey a common message that later life is a time of opportunity and 'old age' a state to be resisted, whilst treating 'disengagement' from society or the marginalization of 'pensioned retirement' as a moral or personal failing. Such a stance is a sharp turn away from modern visions of aging policy, popular during the 1970s and 1980s, where older people were generally expected to embrace a passive lifestyle wholly dependent upon state welfare policy. One key problem, however, is that rationales advocating positive aging are generally embedded in a neo-liberal ideology that encourages individuals to become 'entrepreneurs of themselves,' behaving according to the ideal of economic markets, and choosing the optimal courses of action that maximize their interests. Positive aging thus overlooks how in capitalism the drive of human beings to self-develop tends to be captive to the ideological hegemony of the commoditization of culture. This argument is presented in four sections. Whilst the first part focuses on the genealogy and key tenets of positive aging, the second section presents some international policies advocating the goal of positive aging. The third section provides a constructive critique of positive aging, stressing its neo-liberal bias, and hence, its limitations as a social change program. The final part forwards recommendations that function to improve the democratic credentials of positive aging. ; peer-reviewed

Dieser Sammelband beschäftigt sich mit den im Projekt Who Cares? Alter(n) und Pflege gemeinsam neu denken gesammelten wissenschaftlichen und praxisbezogenen Erfahrungen und Erkenntnissen und umfasst Beiträge aus verschiedenen Disziplinen und Praxisfeldern, die Fragen von Alter(n) und Pflege in unserer Gesellschaft behandeln. Die multidisziplinären Texte zeigen auf, welche Diskurse und Narrative den Umgang mit Alter(n) und Pflege prägen, welche Prozesse hinsichtlich einer positiven Veränderung bereits erfolgen und welche Strategien es noch benötigt, Alter(n) und Pflege gemeinsam positiv neu denken zu können.