Financial Innovation Under COVID-19: Lessons Learned & Solutions
In: Emerging markets, finance and trade: EMFT, Band 59, Heft 8, S. 2329-2330
ISSN: 1558-0938
22 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Emerging markets, finance and trade: EMFT, Band 59, Heft 8, S. 2329-2330
ISSN: 1558-0938
In: Socio-economic planning sciences: the international journal of public sector decision-making, Band 96, S. 102081
ISSN: 0038-0121
In: Emerging markets, finance and trade: EMFT, S. 1-20
ISSN: 1558-0938
In: Journal of safety science and resilience: JSSR, Band 4, Heft 2, S. 220-227
ISSN: 2666-4496
In: Journal of the Operational Research Society, Band 65, Heft 9, S. 1380-1386
SSRN
In: Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems; New State of MCDM in the 21st Century, S. 177-188
In: Journal of multi-criteria decision analysis, Band 18, Heft 1-2, S. 1-4
ISSN: 1099-1360
In: Quantitative Management 1
In: Socio-economic planning sciences: the international journal of public sector decision-making, Band 94, S. 101922
ISSN: 0038-0121
In: Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems; New State of MCDM in the 21st Century, S. 47-56
The authors thank the editor and anonymous referees for their valuable comments and insightful recommendations, and thank Prof. Yucheng Dong for the helpful suggestions. This research was supported in part by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (#71874023, #U1811462, #71725001, #71771037, #71971042, #71910107002) and Major project of the National Social Science Foundation of China (#19ZDA092). Enrique Herrera-Viedma is supported by the FEDER funds in the project TIN2016-75850-R. ; Non-cooperative behavior is a common situation in large-scale group decision-making (LSGDM) problems. In addition, decision makers in LSGDM often use different preference formats to express their opinions, due to their educational backgrounds, knowledge, and experiences. Heterogeneous preference information and non-cooperative behaviors bring challenges to LSGDM. This study develops a consensus reaching model to address heterogeneous LSGDM with non-cooperative behaviors and discuss its application in financial inclusion. Specifically, the cosine similarity degree is introduced to build a distance measure for different preference structures. Clustering analysis is employed to divide large-scale groups and handle non-cooperative behaviors in LSGDM. A consensus degree and a weighting process are proposed to decrease the influence of non-cooperative behaviors and facilitate the consensus reaching process. The convergence of the proposed approach is proven by theoretical and simulation analyses. Experimental studies are carried out to compare the performances of the proposed approach with existing methods. Finally, a real-life example from the "targeted poverty reduction project" in China is presented to validate the proposed approach. The selection of beneficiaries in finance inclusion is difficult due to the lack of credit history, the large number of participants, and the conflicting views of participants. The results showed that the proposed consensus model can integrate opinions of participants using diverse preference formats and reach an agreement efficiently. ; National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) 71874023 U1811462 71725001 71771037 71971042 71910107002 ; Major project of the National Social Science Foundation of China 19ZDA092 ; European Union (EU) TIN2016-75850-R
BASE
To avoid credit fraud, social credit within an economic system has become an increasingly important criterion for the evaluation of economic agent activity and guaranteeing the development of a market economy with minimal supervision costs. This paper provides a comprehensive review of the social credit literature from the perspectives of theoretical foundation, scoring methods, and regulatory mechanisms. The study considers the credit of various economic agents within the social credit system such as countries (or governments), corporations, and individuals and their credit variations in online markets (i.e., network credit). A historical review of the theoretical (or model) development of economic agents is presented together with significant works and future research directions. Some interesting conclusions are summarized from the literature review. (1) Credit theory studies can be categorized into traditional and emerging schools both focusing on the economic explanation of social credit in conjunction with creation and evolution mechanisms. (2) The most popular credit scoring methods include expert systems, econometric models, artificial intelligence (AI) techniques, and their hybrid forms. Evaluation indexes should vary across different target agents. (3) The most pressing task for regulatory mechanisms that supervise social credit to avoid credit fraud is the establishment of shared credit databases with consistent data standards.
BASE
In: Journal of multi-criteria decision analysis, Band 18, Heft 1-2, S. 101-113
ISSN: 1099-1360
ABSTRACTThe reciprocal pairwise comparison matrix is a well‐established technique and widely used in multiple criteria decision making methods. However, some entries in a pairwise comparison matrix may not be available in many real‐world decision problems. The goal of this paper is to propose a new method for estimating missing elements of an incomplete pairwise comparison matrix. A bias induced matrix model (BIMM), which combines the matrix multiplication and the properties of the original reciprocal pairwise comparison matrix, is used to calculate the missing entries in an incomplete pairwise comparison matrix. The proposed BIMM minimizes all bias values of the bias induced matrix to keep the global consistency. The missing value(s) can be estimated by solving the system of equations from the bias induced matrix. The theorems of the BIMM and the related corollaries are developed, and three numerical examples are introduced to illustrate the proposed model. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.