Suchergebnisse

IntroductionNew non-vitamin K Target Specific Oral Anticoagulants (TSOACs) have a favourable risk-benefit profile and debatable cost effectiveness. Large numbers and data from multiple countries in a European study are required to investigate safety issue of TSOACs in subgroups, e.g. people with an intracranial haemorrhage.
Objectives and ApproachWe developed an approach to rapidly replicate data and analyses to support cross-country distributed research within the UK/EU using Electronic Health Records (EHRs). This project was conceptualised and initialled by linking relevant datasets held in multiple data warehouses, in Scotland with the Scottish National Data Safe Haven, and in Wales through the Secure Anonymised Information Linkage (SAIL) databank. Analysts in Edinburgh and Swansea had remote access to each other's datasets and worked collaboratively to harmonise variables and analysis scripts. . A common R code script has been produced to harmonise individual data as well as the outputs from the study.
ResultsThe study screened data on 8M people to develop a cohort that included pseudonymised information of 4,153 individuals in Scotland and 2,676 individuals in Wales, 6,829 individuals in total. Standardised risk analyses were completed in both settings with ongoing work in combining the analyses. In Wales, 39.5% of the patients in the cohort had been admitted to hospitals due to serious vascular events or died caused by these events, after intracranial haemorrhage. Incident rates for male and female are 0.63 and 0.7 respectively. Within the cohort, 0.5% were prescribed with TSOACs and 3% with Warfarin (included as reference). The project is also in the process of including other European jurisdictions.
Conclusion/ImplicationsThe adopted approach was the simplest, yet most efficient and cost-effective method to ensure consistency in analysis and coherence with currently available governance systems of both safe havens. It can also be considered as an initialisation of developing infrastructure to support research using EHRs across the UK and EU.

IntroductionDue to various regulatory barriers, it is increasingly difficult to move pseudonymised routine health data across platforms and among jurisdictions. To tackle this challenge, we summarized five approaches considered to support a scientific research project focused on the risk of the new non-vitamin K Target Specific Oral Anticoagulants (TSOACs) and collaborated between the Farr institute in Wales and Scotland.
ApproachIn Wales, routinely collected health records held in the Secure Anonymous Information Linkage (SAIL) Databank were used to identify the study cohort. In Scotland, data was extracted from national dataset resources administered by the eData Research & Innovation Service (eDRIS) and stored in the Scottish National Data Safe Haven. We adopted a federated data and multiple analysts approach, but arranged simultaneous accesses for Welsh and Scottish analysts to generate study cohorts separately by implementing the same algorithm. Our study cohort across two countries was boosted to 6,829 patients towards risk analysis. Source datasets and data types applied to generate cohorts were reviewed and compared by analysts based on both sites to ensure the consistency and harmonised output.
DiscussionThis project used a fusion of two approaches among five considered. The approach we adopted is a simple, yet efficient and cost-effective method to ensure consistency in analysis and coherence with multiple governance systems. It has limitations and potentials of extending and scaling. It can also be considered as an initialisation of a developing infrastructure to support a distributed team science approach to research using Electronic Health Records (EHRs) across the UK and more widely.
KeywordsTeam science, cross-jurisdictional data linkage, electronic health records