27 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: TD: the journal for transdisciplinary research in Southern Africa, Band 16, Heft 1
ISSN: 2415-2005
Shows how David Easton's Three Levels of Political Science resolves several political science disciplinary and organizational disputes
BASE
In: Perspectives on politics, Band 13, Heft 2, S. 446-448
ISSN: 1541-0986
In: American anthropologist: AA, Band 102, Heft 4, S. 919-921
ISSN: 1548-1433
Debating Diversity: Analysing the Discourse of Tolerance. Jan Blommaert and Jef Verschueren. New York: Routledge, 1998. 233 pp.
In: Identities: global studies in culture and power, Band 7, Heft 2, S. 139-172
ISSN: 1547-3384
In: Identities: global studies in culture and power, Band 7, Heft 2, S. 139-172
ISSN: 1070-289X
In: Identities: global studies in culture and power, Band 7, Heft 2, S. 139-172
ISSN: 1070-289X
In: American anthropologist: AA, Band 95, Heft 3, S. 741-742
ISSN: 1548-1433
SSRN
In: New political science: official journal of the New Political Science Caucus with APSA, Band 42, Heft 1, S. 127-129
ISSN: 1469-9931
In: New political science: official journal of the New Political Science Caucus with APSA, Band 39, Heft 4, S. 473-486
ISSN: 1469-9931
Surveying the field in mid-20th century, David Easton observed that political science primarily lacks "a conceptual framework or systematic theory to give meaning, coherence, and direction to ongoing research." In his most prominent work, The Political System, he writes, "In political science there has been little deliberate effort to formulate a conceptual framework for the whole field." The problem he undertakes, then, is that of "defining political science," and thus to "define the core of the field." This was Easton's heroic mission.
BASE
In: Qualitative and Multi-Method Research, Fall 2017
SSRN
In: APSA 2014 Annual Meeting Paper
SSRN
Working paper