Some Implications of the Sixteen Personality Factor Questionnaire for Marital Guidance
In: The family coordinator, Band 25, Heft 2, S. 189
6 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: The family coordinator, Band 25, Heft 2, S. 189
In: Sage open, Band 3, Heft 2
ISSN: 2158-2440
Two multi-instrument investigations in a university clinic/lab provided an opportunity to explore the impact of reducing the number of response alternatives in a scale measuring vocational personality traits. In a simulation study, a standard computer-based administration provided a numeric scale for each item ranging from 0 to 10. The tests were then rescored to simulate the effect of only three choices. For the follow-up study, two versions of the scale were created, one with two response options and the other with six response options, and were randomly assigned to participants. Typical relationships were evident between the vocational personality traits and scores on standard measures of core personality traits with negligible impact from reducing the number of response alternatives. Neither the ability of the participants nor the self-reported distress had a measurable impact on the utility of the results with the reduction in response alternatives.
In: Journal of employment counseling, Band 26, Heft 4, S. 146-152
ISSN: 2161-1920
Data from this study identified a significant discrepancy between preservice counselors' perceptions of their career opportunities and actual placement data.
In: Multicultural perspectives: an official publication of the National Association for Multicultural Education, Band 3, Heft 2, S. 13-18
ISSN: 1532-7892
In: Journal of employment counseling, Band 39, Heft 3, S. 127-137
ISSN: 2161-1920
Despite the increasing availability of online counseling services, many questions remain unanswered. This study compared the effectiveness of a specific employment counseling activity, vocational interest inventory interpretation, across 3 delivery modalities: (a) online text chat; (b) online text chat with video cues; and (c) traditional, face‐to‐face interpretation. The difference in ratings of session value between text chat with video and face‐to‐face modalities was not significant; both were rated significantly higher than text chat alone. The results provide tentative support for online delivery of vocational test interpretation if video cues are available but suggest caution with use of text chat alone.