Suchergebnisse

"This book offers an accessible overview of the issues related to the Women, Peace, and Security (WPS) global agenda. This new edition has been updated and includes new chapters on WPS and Environmental Change and on WPS in Regional and Security Organizations. The 2nd edition provides explains Women, Peace and Security as a security framework, different though related to both gender equality as a social justice issue or a Diversity, Equity and Inclusion issue. Within the context of the changing nature of warfare, a complex and volatile global political climate, and through consideration of empirical evidence, it examines the definitions, theoretical underpinnings and methodological challenges associated with implementing WPS. It then discusses with more specificity violence against women, women civilians in war, the role of women in peacemaking, women in the military and in development, and women politicians, with new material on environmental change and on regional and security organisations. Examples and case studies draw from Africa, Asia, the Middle East, Europe and North and South America. The need for more sex-disaggregated data on every topic is emphasized throughout, necessary to both demonstrate relationships between gender and security and to identify solutions to problems. The book concludes with a look to the future and number of action items from the macro to the micro level. This book will be of much interest to students of peace studies, security studies, gender studies and IR, as well as professional military college students"--

chapter 1 Protecting Space Assets -- chapter 2 Congested, Contested, and Competitive -- chapter 3 Avoiding Thucydides' Trap -- chapter 4 Deter, Defend, Defeat -- chapter 5 Feeding the Beast -- chapter 6 Space Development and Governance -- chapter 7 Space at the Tipping Point.

Why war colleges? -- Warriors & scholars -- The students: too valuable to fail -- Faculty: but not necessarily in a collegial sense -- The curriculum: moving toward intellectual agility -- Recommendations & conclusion

"Joan Johnson-Freese argues that the race for space weapons and the U.S. quest for exclusive or at least dominant ownership of strategic space assets have alienated the very allies that the United States needs in order to maintain its leading role in space exploration. Taking a balanced look at the issues that have contributed to the decline of America's manned space program, such as the lack of political support and funding, Johnson-Freese offers not only a critique but also a plan for enhancing U.S. space security through cooperation rather than competition." "Space as a Strategic Asset underscores the danger of allowing our space program to languish and the importance of cooperation in protecting the security of our country and the world."--Jacket

Sun Tzu's adage of "bearing down on the enemy" seems to encapsulate the current approaches of both the United States and China to their space programs. China does not have to be an enemy of the United States, but it is certainly destined to be a competitor, if the United States continues to exploit the obvious military advantages of space and China feels compelled to respond.

The US' leadership role in space is by no means moribund, yet the perception of absolute US space leadership has clearly declined. A 2013 HuffPost/YouGov poll indicated that almost half of the American public thinks the US is losing its supremacy in space. This shift in perception can be seen internationally as well. A 2013 piece in Der Spiegel suggested that Europe is thinking of redirecting its primary space alliance from the US to China, as China's global 'rising power' status now extends to space. Though the American public still supports the space program, the country is no longer willing to allocate the levels of funding needed to deliver the space spectaculars of yore, spectaculars that engender perceptions of leadership. As a result, perceptions of US primacy in space exploration will continue to decay. Contributing to the problem are unrealistically high expectations, formed during the height of the US space program. Adapted from the source document.