Suchergebnisse

Since 2015, China's economic performance has initially exhibited characteristics with enhancing quality and increasing efficiency in economic new normal. This article, based on economic operation status since 2015 under the logical framework of economic development with "recognizing the new normal, adapting the new normal, guiding the new normal and exploring the new normal," aims at commenting on and forecasting for China's current and recent macroeconomic development from the following ten perspectives of economic growth, indigenous innovation, industrial structure, ecological environment, regional coordination, people's livelihood improvement, mixed ownership, financial development and coordination between market and government.

Abstract
For the scientific understanding and correct adjustment of domestic and foreign economic operations, both academic research and policy-making require the analysis of the relationship between the proportion principle of labor distribution, market mechanism and state economic adjustment. The distribution of the total quantity of labor in proportional fashion is a general principle that can be applied to all social forms. Market mechanism is an important method for implementing the proportion principle of labor distribution, and has played a decisive role in this area ever since the simple commodity economy was transformed into the capitalist commodity economy. State economic adjustment is another way in which the proportion principle of labor distribution can be implemented in a state-regulated economy. In China's socialist market economy, market mechanism and state economic adjustment work together as an organically integrated whole, implementing the proportion principle of labor distribution through complementary functions and synergic effects.

Sweden is a model of social democracy in which the Social Democratic Party has long been in power, and in which distribution under the conditions of monopoly capitalism has been the object of one-sided praise. Wealth and income inequality in Sweden was in the past relatively low, but in recent years has shown a tendency to undergo a structural increase, and some indicator values are already at comparatively high levels. Investigating the causes, we find that the ownership structure of the means of production, dominated by monopoly capitalist private ownership, has played a decisive role in the creation and evolution of wealth and income inequality within Sweden. The Swedish welfare system, whose core elements are social security provisions and the tax system, has played an important role in alleviating wealth and income inequality and in promoting social equity, but the degree of adjustment it achieves is relatively limited, and it now faces challenges in ensuring its sustainability. In recent years, the weakening of the organizational strength of trade unions in Sweden has resulted in an imbalance between the power of labor and capital, an imbalance that to some extent has promoted the widening of wealth and income inequality. With the deepening of the basic contradiction of capitalism, the trend to widening wealth and income inequality in Sweden represents a historical inevitability.