Suchergebnisse

Drawing on children's narratives about their everyday life this book explores how children understand the process of socialization as an embodied, biographical experience at home, at school and in the neighbourhood. Through close analysis of what children have to say, the book shows how children actively learn from and contribute to the mundane practices and interactions of everyday social life. Through these experiences they get to know about social norms, rules and values and also develop their sense of self and identity. Working from this child-centred perspective and drawing on recent theoretical ideas about personal life and the individual, the book demonstrates the valuable contribution that childhood studies can make to long-standing sociological debates about processes of social reproduction and social change.

In the light of the changing landscape of social research, this article explores the role of the analytic imagination in the process of qualitative data analysis. It argues that while team research, secondary data analysis and the use of computerized qualitative data analysis packages may be altering the ways in which research and analysis are carried out, this need not change the processes of interpretation that are at the heart of qualitative data analysis. Here, as the article explores, imaginative acts are key to the analytical craftsmanship involved in interpretive analysis. This a process illustrated through the analysis of parent and child narratives gathered during a project about families and food.

This article explores notions of the "child as citizen" and "children's citizenship" in the context of possibilities and promises for the rights of children that are laid out in the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child. It poses the question, Can "children's citizenship" ever be fully accomplished for and/or by children? The article begins with an examination of contemporary theories of citizenship and considers the grounds for children's citizenship in the light of the ways in which "childhood" is culturally, socially, economically, and politically constructed in different societies. It suggests that in social investment states, such as the United Kingdom, the contemporary cultural politics of childhood mean that children's citizenship remains ambiguous. What is needed, the article suggests, is a greater understanding at the local level of how children's experiences as members of society unfold. Thus, taking England as a case study, and drawing on some empirical research with children's experiences in children's hospitals, the article illustrates the ways in which adults' ideas about childhood limit children's agency and actions, thereby denying them status as citizens. [Reprinted by permission of Sage Publications Inc., copyright The American Academy of Political and Social Science.]

This article explores notions of the "child as citizen" and "children's citizenship" in the context of possibilities and promises for the rights of children that are laid out in the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child. It poses the question, Can "children's citizenship" ever be fully accomplished for and/or by children? The article begins with an examination of contemporary theories of citizenship and considers the grounds for children's citizenship in the light of the ways in which "childhood" is culturally, socially, economically, and politically constructed in different societies. It suggests that in social investment states, such as the United Kingdom, the contemporary cultural politics of childhood mean that children's citizenship remains ambiguous. What is needed, the article suggests, is a greater understanding at the local level of how children's experiences as members of society unfold. Thus, taking England as a case study, and drawing on some empirical research with children's experiences in children's hospitals, the article illustrates the ways in which adults' ideas about childhood limit children's agency and actions, thereby denying them status as citizens.

In this article, I explore the lessons that the anthropological debates of the 1980s about writing culture might have for contemporary childhood research within anthropology and the social sciences more generally. I argue that the current rhetoric about "giving voice to children," commonplace both inside and outside the academy, poses a threat to the future of childhood research because it masks a number of important conceptual and epistemological problems. In particular, these relate to questions of representation, issues of authenticity, the diversity of children's experiences, and children's participation in research, all of which need to be addressed by anthropologists in their own research practices with children. Unless anthropologists do so, childhood research risks becoming marginalized once more and will fail to provide an arena within which children are seen as social actors who can provide a unique perspective on the social world about matters that concern them as children.