Exploring tailored family planning strategies for marginalized groups, this work delves into comparative insights from Asian contexts, providing actionable approaches to empower and transform communities, foster sustainable development and improve reproductive health outcomes.
Zugriffsoptionen:
Die folgenden Links führen aus den jeweiligen lokalen Bibliotheken zum Volltext:
Cover -- Title Page -- Copyright Page -- Blurbs -- Dedication -- Contents -- About the Author -- Foreword -- Preface -- Acknowledgments -- Towards Effective Utilization of This Book -- Chapter 1 Introduction: Children's Perspectives in Social Research -- 1.1 Shift In Paradigm: Object to Active Subject -- 1.2 Children's Rights, Protocols, and Participation -- 1.3 Enriching Research Outcomes -- 1.4 Unearthing Hidden Issues and Vulnerabilities -- 1.5 Empowerment and Agency -- 1.6 Role Of Parents and Guardians -- 1.7 Role of Culture -- 1.8 Research With Special Needs Children -- 1.9 Participatory Research Approaches and Involvement of Children -- Chapter 2 Research Tools and Techniques: An Overview -- 2.1 Understanding Research Approaches -- 2.1.1 Quantitative Research Approach -- 2.1.1.1 Key Characteristics of Quantitative Research -- 2.1.1.2 Relevance of Quantitative Research Approach to Research with Children -- 2.1.1.3 Limitations of Quantitative Research -- 2.1.2 Qualitative Research Approach -- 2.1.2.1 Key Characteristics of Qualitative Research -- 2.1.2.2 Relevance to Research with Children -- 2.1.2.3 Limitations of Qualitative Research -- 2.1.3 Mixed Methods Approach -- 2.1.3.1 Key Characteristics of the Mixed Methods Approach -- 2.1.3.2 Relevance of Mixed Methods to Research with Children -- 2.1.3.3 Limitations of the Mixed Methods Approach -- 2.2 Exploring Participatory Action Research with Children -- 2.2.1 Key Characteristics of Participatory Action Research (PAR) -- 2.2.2 Relevance of Participatory Action Research (PAR) to Research with Children -- 2.2.3 Challenges and Considerations in Conducting Research with Children -- 2.3 Leveraging Mixed Methods for Insights -- 2.3.1 Benefits of Leveraging Mixed Methods -- 2.3.2 Considerations for Leveraging Mixed Methods -- 2.3.3 Strategies for Effective Integration of Mixed Methods.
Zugriffsoptionen:
Die folgenden Links führen aus den jeweiligen lokalen Bibliotheken zum Volltext:
Chapter 1: Introduction to Social Work -- Chapter 2: Introduction to Fieldwork in Social Work -- Chapter 3: Preparing for Fieldwork in Social Work -- Chapter 4: Field Assignments and Duties in Social Work Field Practice -- Chapter 5: Culturally Responsive Diversity in Social Work Field Practice -- Chapter 6: Developing Professional Skills in Social Work Field Practice -- Chapter 7: Assessing and Planning for Agency-Level Field Practice in Social Work -- Chapter 8: Implementation and Intervention in Field Practice at the Agency Level -- Chapter 9: Data Collection for Field Reports in Social Work Practice -- Chapter 10: Navigating Field Settings and Agency Dynamics -- Chapter 11: Working Within Systems: Applications of Assessment Planning Interventions -- Chapter 12: Supervision of Fieldwork Students -- Chapter 13: Challenges and Opportunities in Fieldwork Practice -- Chapter 14: Fieldwork Report Writing Format -- Chapter 15: Reflective Practice and Learning in Fieldwork -- Chapter 16: Concluding and Future Directions in Social Work Field Practice.
Zugriffsoptionen:
Die folgenden Links führen aus den jeweiligen lokalen Bibliotheken zum Volltext:
Covering disaster scenarios, and the causes and consequences of disaster displacement, Disaster, Displacement and Resilient Livelihoods: Perspectives from South Asiafocuses on the South Asian context, generating new insights and considering the policy implications of strategies for building resilient livelihoods.
Zugriffsoptionen:
Die folgenden Links führen aus den jeweiligen lokalen Bibliotheken zum Volltext:
"This book discusses the theoretical aspect to write a PhD research proposal. It provides three templates of three approaches such as quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods and then includes eight proposals in the line of these templates"--Provided by publisher.
Zugriffsoptionen:
Die folgenden Links führen aus den jeweiligen lokalen Bibliotheken zum Volltext:
"This pivot examines non-governmental organization (NGO) interventions in two community development initiatives, namely social capital and community empowerment, and their role in funding and formulating development frameworks in developing countries like Bangladesh. It considers the key development discourse issues of collective action, social trust and access to knowledge, to political processes and to financial, social and natural resources. Given the large proportion of foreign funding, NGOs and donors also increasingly face the twin challenges of demonstrating both efficient and effective delivery of services and accountability in their relationships with various stakeholders. Reflecting on the relevance of NGOs for community development, and the merits, challenges and limitations of NGO activities, this books provides a comprehensive study of NGO participation in community development in Bangladesh and Third World countries more widely to highlight a global concern with international implications."--
AbstractThis special issue explores social harmony and community wellbeing with some examples of Asian countries. These are essential tools to fight against many social problems and meet elucidation. While these concepts are not documented well in social work literature, the articles on this special issue will provide thoughtful and valuable guidelines to the readers, academics, policy makers and researchers for expanding and improving social and community services.
Despite significant contributions from non-governmental organizations (NGOs) in socio-economic development in Bangladesh, the evidence in community development is little known. The findings of this article are based on two NGOs working with two indigenous communities. The study used a qualitative case study research approach, where a multi-method data collection procedure was applied. The analysis of the findings underscored the role of these two NGOs in four ingredients of community development: improving participation, social networking, partnership and development ownership. The results showed that the NGOs' contributions in community development were credible. The findings provide important guidelines for social workers, NGO workers and development practitioners.
In recent times, China has significantly reduced hunger in its populace. The main objective of this paper was to analyze some of the contextual socioeconomic factors contributing to the reduction of hunger in China, using Qualitative Interpretative Meta‐Synthesis (QIMS). The results revealed that China has followed a broad‐based and multispectral approach to reduce hunger. Factors, such as poverty alleviation; social safety nets for disadvantaged villagers; agricultural development and land reforms; regional development and equity in development activities; infrastructural development; and political‐economic reform and sustainable growth were influential in reducing hunger in China. Poverty is attributed as one of the principal contributors and is interlinked with many other dimensions. The findings of this paper are a useful guide to the Chinese government, policy‐makers, international organizations, and development practitioners.
The purpose of this study was to investigate contributions by non‐governmental organizations (NGOs) to social capital and community empowerment that facilitate community development. A multi‐method research approach was conducted, where a number of qualitative data collection methods were employed. Data was collected from two indigenous communities, goldsmith and blacksmith, served by two NGOs—Proshika and Practical Action Bangladesh (PAB). The findings showed that both NGOs played a substantial role in social capital development and community empowerment toward community development. The findings of this study will provide valuable input to the community development field.
This paper exposed the major challenges that the non‐governmental organizations (NGOs) face in improving development ownership among vulnerable people in community empowerment projects in Bangladesh. The finding, based on a qualitative research approach, used multi‐method data collection procedures. Data were collected from two NGOs, Proshika and Practical Action Bangladesh (PAB), working with two vulnerable communities—blacksmiths and goldsmiths. The results showed that NGOs faced a number of challenges, including lack of understanding about the local context, initiatives to localize global development tools, developing partnership, and space for local people in the development processes. The paper argued that, without securing development ownership, the NGOs' activities toward community empowerment of vulnerable people would not be possible. The findings of the paper would be valuable guidelines for policy makers, development practitioners, NGO workers, and academicians.