Suchergebnisse

When in 1987 D. Marcus claimed the virtual lack of hermeneutics of the natural science as a field of recognizable individual cognitive interests, his argument made a deep impression on the philosophers of science. However, in 1998 P. Hi­lan, polemicizing with Marcus, put forward the thesis about the existence of "strong hermeneutics" – a philosophical genre of hermeneutics of the natural sci­ence. In a number of subsequent works, he gave a detailed exposition of his point of view, establishing links between the modern philosophy of the natu­ral sciences and philosophical hermeneutics. It was based on the inclusion in the philosophy of science those aspects of historicity, culture and tradition that lack in the traditional analysis of the relationship between theory and explana­tion. The expansion of the range of hermeneutics' participation in scientific knowledge turned out to be associated with the answer to the question of whether hermeneutics can improve our understanding, primarily the understand­ing of the essence of those things that fall into the sphere of natural sciences. Given that human subjects and communities are inseparable from nature, this un­derstanding must necessarily take into account the biological aspects of this unity. This forces us to include in the interpretive field of hermeneutics living matter, which should be understood not only as an object of hermeneutic inter­pretation by people, but at a deep level and as an interpretation of living beings themselves. The formation and legalization of the interpretation of this type dates back to 2002, when A. Markos published the book "Readers of the Book of Life", which called for the study of the "biohermeneutic" understanding of sign processes in living systems. The possibility of using this type of interpre­tation in a situation that arose in connection with the increasing exploitation of information technology and the Internet was also extremely interesting. Herme­neutics, which uses an interpretation of this type, is called "digital hermeneu­tics". It is based on the concept of "digital ontology", which was introduced by M. Eldred and R. Capurro: things exist (are understood) as much as we are able to digitize them. Digital hermeneutics should be considered as a general prob­lematization of the supposed homology between reality and its digital represen­tations.

Bibliography of agriculture ; Chemical abstracts ; GeoRef ; Biological abstracts ; Excerpta medica ; Vol. 1, 1906, was issued in 1 section of 10 numbers, with a botanical supplement of 5 numbers; v. 2-4, 1907-1909, in 3 sections: Section A. General science; Section B. Medical sciences; Section C. Botany. Vols. 5-13, 1910-1918, in 4 sections: Section A. Chemical and geological sciences and the industries; Section B. Tropical medicine (varies slightly) (called Medical sciences, v. 5-6); Section C. Botany; Section D. General biology, ethnology and anthropology (varies slightly). ; Suspended Nov. 1941-Mar. 1947, except for an issue dated Aug. 1944 and "published by the Institute of Science and Technology." ; Vol. 1 accompanied by a separately paged supplement of 5 numbers (Apr.-Dec. 1906). ; Mode of access: Internet. ; Vols. for 1906- published by the Bureau of Science; -June 1947 by the Dept. of Agriculture and Commerce; July/Aug. 1947-Dec. 1950 by the Institute of Science; Mar. 1951-June 1958 by the Institute of Science and Technology; Sept. 1958-Mar./June 1972 by the National Institute of Science and Technology; Sept./Dec. 1972-Jan./June 1982 by the National Science Development Board; July/Dec. 1983-Jan./Mar 1987 by the National Institute of Science and Technology and the National Science and Technology Authority; Apr./June-Oct./Dec. 1987 by the Industrial Technology Development Institute and the Dept. of Science and Technology; Jan./Mar. 1988- by the Science and Technology Information Institute. ; Vols. 1-10, 1906-1915. 1 v.; vols. 11-20, 1916-1922. 1 v.; vols. 11-28, 1916-1925. 1 v.; vols. 59-79, 1936-1950. 1 v.; vols. 110-124, 1981-1995. 1 v. ; Preceded by a series of 35 bulletins issued from 1902-1905 by the Bureau of Government Laboratories (cataloged as monographs in Old Catalog).