23 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Environmental and resource economics, Band 84, Heft 4, S. 919-946
ISSN: 1573-1502
In: American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Band 100, Heft 4, S. 1186-1206
SSRN
In: Waste management: international journal of integrated waste management, science and technology, Band 187, S. 101-108
ISSN: 1879-2456
In: Environmental science and pollution research: ESPR, Band 28, Heft 25, S. 33632-33648
ISSN: 1614-7499
In: Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Band 64, Heft 4, S. 1260-1281
SSRN
In: The Chinese economy: translations and studies, Band 50, Heft 3, S. 157-167
ISSN: 1558-0954
In: Prepared for Presentation at the Agricultural & Applied Economics Association and Western Agricultural Economics Association Annual Meeting, Boston, Massachusetts, July 31-August 2 2016
SSRN
Working paper
In: Emerging markets, finance and trade: EMFT, Band 50, Heft sup2, S. 135-143
ISSN: 1558-0938
In: American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Band 101, Heft 5, S. 1386-1400
SSRN
In: Review of Development Economics, Band 23, Heft 1, S. 435-453
SSRN
In: Prepared for Presentation at the Agricultural & Applied Economics Association and Western Agricultural Economics Association Annual Meeting, Boston, Massachusetts, July 31-August 2, 2016
SSRN
Working paper
In: American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Band 88, Heft 4, S. 1034-1049
SSRN
In: Applied economic perspectives and policy, Band 45, Heft 1, S. 4-21
ISSN: 2040-5804
AbstractWith the unique mimicry of the sensory experiences of meats, the plant‐based meat alternatives (PBMA) appeal to consumers outside the traditional vegetarian demographics. This study analyzes market expenditure data from 2017 to 2020 to evaluate the demand for PBMA in relation to meats. Results show that PBMA is a complement for beef and pork while a substitute for chicken, turkey, and fish. Although the current market demand for PBMA is still incomparable with meats, the growth of PBMA sales is significant. This study sheds light on marketing strategies and policies toward the future of PBMA and the fresh meat sector.
In: World development: the multi-disciplinary international journal devoted to the study and promotion of world development, Band 151, S. 1-13
World Affairs Online
In: Social science quarterly, Band 95, Heft 3, S. 868-881
ISSN: 1540-6237
ObjectivesIndoor air pollution (IAP) from combustion‐generated pollutants, which are generated by solid fuel combustion for heating, has received considerable attention in recent years based on its health hazards for the human body. This article focuses on the health risk of heating fuel choice and estimates the health benefit (monetary benefits from medical expense savings) related to the improvement of the heating system.MethodsUsing the Kentucky Homeplace Program survey data and a health production function framework, this article explored the health implications of heating fuel choice by estimating the relationship between individuals' use of polluting heating fuel and the number of medical services received annually.ResultsThe results show that using polluting heating increases doctor visits and medical expenses. Individuals may pay as much as about $135.99 for shifting from using polluting heating to nonpolluting heating.ConclusionsThe result provides some evidence to support the linkage between health risks and polluting heating use. Some demographic and lifestyle characteristics did have significant effects on medical care expenses. Government could consider subsidies to encourage lower income groups to shift to nonpolluting heating fuels or use improved technology in order to reduce the public insurance cost.