Suchergebnisse

'Access to safe water is a fundamental human need and therefore a basic human right' Kofi Annan, United Nations Secretary General Edited by two world-renowned scientists in the field, The Handbook of Water and Wastewater Microbiology provides a definitive and comprehensive coverage of water and wastewater microbiology. With contributions from experts from around the world, this book gives a global perspective on the important issues faced in the provision of safe drinking water, the problems of dealing with aquatic pollution and the processes involved in wastewater management. Starting with an introductory chapter of basic microbiological principles, The Handbook of Water and Wastewater Microbiology develops these principles further, ensuring that this is the essential text for process engineers with little microbiological experience and specialist microbiologists alike. Comprehensive selection of reviews dealing with drinking water and aquatic pollution Provides an understading of basic microbiology and how it is applied to engineering process solutions Suitable for all levels of knowledge in microbiology -from those with no background to specialists who require the depth of information

AbstractScreenings produced as the first stage of wastewater treatment and currently disposed of to landfill, are rich in volatile organic solids, nitrogen and phosphorus which could be recovered through anaerobic digestion. Biochemical methane potential (BMP) tests on screenings demonstrated a methane yield of 0.33 m3 methane/kg volatile solids (VS) and a VS destruction of 50%. Consequently, the effect of a range of hydraulic retention time (HRT) and organic loading rates (OLRs) was evaluated in lab‐scale continuously fed mesophilic digesters. The highest methane yield of 0.416 Nm3 methane/kg VS added was observed with an HRT of 15 days and an OLR of 2.5 kg VS/m3/day, when up to 65% of the VS were destroyed. If treated by anaerobic digestion, every dry tonne of screenings digested would divert 466 kg from landfill, save 4.6 tonne equivalent carbon dioxide (CO2 eq) and deliver 3.4 MWh of renewable energy.

AbstractIt is estimated that up to 342 wastewater treatment plants (Wwtps) in England and Wales will require a phosphorus (P) consent by 2010. Although biological P removal is considered to be the most sustainable option for P removal, it has always been problematic for plants that remove both nitrogen and P due to the inadequate concentration of organic material during wet periods. Two biological nutrient removal (BNR) configurations, the Johannesburg (JHB) process and a combined JHB and five‐stage Bardenpho process, were evaluated over a period of 2 years to assess the impact of sewage strength on bio‐P removal. The JHB achieved an average effluent total phosphorus (TP) of 2.4 mg/L and the combined JHB and five‐stage process averaged 1.4 mg/L effluent TP. The major problems affecting the performance of both configurations were: dissolved oxygen (DO) in the recycled mixed liquor, nitrate in the return activated sludge (RAS) and low influent biological oxygen demand (BOD) concentrations. Acetate dosing proved successful as a source of volatile fatty acids (VFAs) in the anaerobic zone during periods of low‐strength sewage. An acetate dosing strategy based on the influent flow rate to the plant was found to be a simple and effective technique that ensured that a consent of <1 mg TP/L could be met.

AbstractEnergy production from a coblended mixture of biosolids and food waste was optimised for hydrogen and methane production. Four different blends were prepared by varying the carbohydrate : protein (carb : pro) ratios. The biosolids contained a low carbohydrate fraction and so was not suitable for hydrogen production when used alone. However coblending this waste with a carbohydrate‐enriched food waste produced a greater hydrogen yield, making this option viable. Batch studies showed that the optimised mix had a biosolids concentration of 25.7% (w/w). The largest hydrogen yield of 198.5 mL/gVSremoved was observed when the carb : pro was 2.78, and this was threefold higher than the other carb : pro ratios evaluated in this study. The digestate recovered after hydrogen recovery had a C : N of 17.5, which is in the ideal range for methane production. The biochemical methane potential test showed a methane yield of 239 mL/gVSremoved, and the total volatile solids destruction following two‐phase hydrogen and methane production was 93%.