Disability and Other Human Questions by Dan Goodley (Emerald Publishing, 2021), 145pp
In: International journal of disability and social justice, Band 2, Heft 2
ISSN: 2732-4044
5 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: International journal of disability and social justice, Band 2, Heft 2
ISSN: 2732-4044
In: BioSocieties: an interdisciplinary journal for social studies of life sciences, Band 12, Heft 4, S. 635-640
ISSN: 1745-8560
In: Feminist review, Band 118, Heft 1, S. 61-79
ISSN: 1466-4380
This paper appraises the role of critical-feminist figurations within the environmental humanities, focusing on the capacity of figures to produce situated environmental knowledges and pose site-specific ethical obligations. We turn to four environments—the home, the skies, the seas and the microscopic—to examine the work that various figures do in these contexts. We elucidate how diverse figures—ranging from companion animals to birds, undersea creatures and bugs—reflect productive traffic between longstanding concerns in feminist theory and the environmental humanities, and generate new insights related to situated knowledges, feminist care-ethics and the politics of everyday sensory encounters. We also argue, however, that certain figures have tested the limits of theoretical approaches which have emerged as the product of dialogue between feminist theory and environmental studies. In particular, we explore how particular figures have complicated ethical questions of how to intervene in broad environmental threats borne of anthropogenic activities, and of who or what to include in relational ethical frameworks.
This paper appraises the role of critical-feminist figurations within the environmental humanities, focusing on the capacity of figures to produce situated environmental knowledges and pose site-specific ethical obligations. We turn to four environments—the home, the skies, the seas and the microscopic—to examine the work that various figures do in these contexts. We elucidate how diverse figures—ranging from companion animals to birds, undersea creatures and bugs—reflect productive traffic between longstanding concerns in feminist theory and the environmental humanities, and generate new insights related to situated knowledges, feminist care-ethics and the politics of everyday sensory encounters. We also argue, however, that certain figures have tested the limits of theoretical approaches which have emerged as the product of dialogue between feminist theory and environmental studies. In particular, we explore how particular figures have complicated ethical questions of how to intervene in broad environmental threats borne of anthropogenic activities, and of who or what to include in relational ethical frameworks.
BASE
In: BioSocieties: an interdisciplinary journal for social studies of life sciences, Band 15, Heft 3, S. 470-499
ISSN: 1745-8560