Juvenile Courts in the United States. H. H. Lou
In: Social service review: SSR, Band 2, Heft 1, S. 151-151
ISSN: 1537-5404
6 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Social service review: SSR, Band 2, Heft 1, S. 151-151
ISSN: 1537-5404
Whenever the government makes medical resource allocation choices, there will be opportunity costs associated with those choices: some patients will have treatment and live longer, while a different group of patients will die prematurely. Because of this, we have to make sure that the benefits we get from investing in treatment A are large enough to justify the benefits forgone from not investing in the next best alternative, treatment B. There has been an increase in spending and reallocation of resources during the COVID-19 pandemic that may have been warranted given the urgency of the situation. However, these actions do not bypass the opportunity cost principle although they can appear to in the short term, since spending increases cannot continue indefinitely and there are patient groups who lose out when resources are redirected to pandemic services. Therefore, policy-makers must consider who bears the cost of the displaced healthcare resources. Failure to do so runs a risk of reducing overall population health while disproportionally worsening health in socially disadvantaged groups. We give the example of ethnic minorities in England who already had the worst health and, due to structural injustices, were hardest hit by the pandemic and may stand to lose the most when services are reallocated to meet the resource demands of the crisis. How can we prevent this form of health inequity? Our proposal is forward-looking: we suggest that the government should invest our resources wisely while taking issues of equity into account–that is, introduce cost–equity analysis.
BASE
In: Public policy and administration: PPA, Band 30, Heft 2, S. 165-181
ISSN: 1749-4192
This article presents research on nurses' perceptions of the 2005 UK NHS reform 'Agenda for Change' (AfC) in order to identify lessons to inform future NHS policy development. Semi-structured interviews ( n = 18) were conducted with NHS nurses who were in post prior to the reform and subsequently subjected to the policy reform. Interviews were undertaken by a single researcher and lasted between 40–60 minutes. Interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim and thematic analysis was used to identify key concepts and findings. The article finds that each facet of the Agenda for Change was not perceived to have achieved the policy goals it intended to. The article concludes that repeated political re-organisation of the National Health Service (NHS) in England has been demoralising for hospital staff.
In: Hill , H , Birch , S , Tickle , M , McDonald , R , Donaldson , M , O'Carolan , D & Brocklehurst , P 2017 , ' Does capitation affect the delivery of oral healthcare and access to services? Evidence from a pilot contact in Northern Ireland ' , BMC Health Services Research , vol. 17 , 175 . https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2117-3
BackgroundIn May 2009, the Northern Ireland government introduced General Dental Services (GDS) contracts based on capitation in dental practices newly set up by a corporate dental provider to promote access to dental care in populations that had previously struggled to secure service provision. Dental service provision forms an important component of general health services for the population, but the implications of health system financing on care delivered and the financial cost of services has received relatively little attention in the research literature. The aim of this study is to evaluate the policy effect capitation payment in recently started corporate practices had on the delivery of primary oral healthcare in Northern Ireland and access to services.MethodsWe analysed the policy initiative in Northern Ireland as a natural experiment to find the impact on healthcare delivery of the newly set up corporate practices that use a prospective capitation system to remunerate primary care dentists. Data was collected from GDS claim forms submitted to the Business Services Organisation (BSO) between April 2011 and October 2014. Health and Social Care Board (HSCB) practices operating within a capitation system were matched to a control group, who were remunerated using a retrospective fee-for-service system.ResultsNo evidence of patient selection was found in the HSCB practices set up by a corporate provider and operated under capitation. However, patients were less likely to visit the dentist and received less treatment when they did attend, compared to those belonging to the control group (P < 0.05). The extent of preventive activity offered and the patient payment charge revenue did not differ between the two practice groups.ConclusionAlthough remunerating NHS primary care dentists in newly set up corporate practices using a prospective capitation system managed costs within healthcare, there is evidence that this policy may have reduced access to care of registered patients.
BASE