Suchergebnisse

Surabaya has a problem regarding its education system, for instance, the low participation, specifically at the high school level. Many children do not continue their education until their high school years. This problem would hopefully be solved by the Surabaya City government through the Peraturan Walikota Nomor 49 Tahun 2017 on the establishment and organization of a technical implementation unit of non-formal education, Sanggar Kegiatan Belajar (SKB) at the Department of Education of Surabaya. This is a community empowerment program to reduce the dropout rate, particularly for high school students in non-formal educational institutions. This study seeks to observe the conduct of the non-formal education reform by the government of Surabaya. This research is descriptive qualitative by utilizing data collection as its technique, interview, and observation. The interviews were conducted on the determination of informants according to the information required by the researcher. The results showed that education-themed empowerment is to increase students' participation which has not been effective. This is observed through less enthusiasm of dropped out children to participate in the non-formal education in SKB. Supportive actions from the parents are highly expected to encourage their children to participate in their education process to realize the 9-year compulsory education program.

The aims of this research were to find out the governmentality carried out by the Surabaya city government in implementing Development Plan Deliberation electronic. This was based on the Surabaya city government implementing governmentality that caused people to become apathetic. The theory used is the governmentality technique which explains that governmentality is built on three bases, namely 1) Governmentalized localities, 2) regulatory communities, and 3) Subject formation. The method of research uses a descriptive qualitative approach. Data collection methods conducted through in-depth interviews, secondary data, and field observations. The results showed that the technique of governmentalized localities is carried out by means of a development paradigm that the community is the main actor of development so that the citizens association level e- Development Plan Deliberation can decide on development proposals. Regulatory communities techniques are formed through social interaction between community representatives and village head in discussing the priorities of development planning proposals. While the formation of subjects is carried out by the village head by giving knowledge proposals so that the proposals are in accordance with the city development roadmap. In conclusion, the governmentality carried out by the Surabaya city government has had a good and bad impact on development planning. The impact is good, the community becomes more aware of the proposed development planning in the city of Surabaya, while the adverse effects of the community are apathetic because they are disappointed with their proposals which are often not approved