This paper briefly introduces a summary of the special session on Hybrid Reasoning and Coordination Methods on Multi-Agent Systems, held in conjunction with the 4th International Conference on Hybrid Artificial Intelligence Systems 2009 (HAIS'09). The research papers of this session have been revised and extended and the final results are published in this journal special issue. ; This special session was supported by CONSOLIDER-INGENIO 2010 under grant CSD2007-00022 and by the Spanish government and GVA funds under TIN2006-14630-C0301 and PROMETEO/2008/051 projects.
In real-time Multi-Agent Systems, Real-Time Agents merge intelligent deliberative techniques with real-time reactive actions in a distributed environment. CBR has been successfully applied in Multi-Agent Systems as deliberative mechanism for agents. However, in the case of Real-Time Multi-Agent Systems the temporal restrictions of their Real-Time Agents make their deliberation process to be temporally bounded. Therefore, this paper presents a guide to temporally bound the CBR to adapt it to be used as deliberative mechanism for Real-Time Agents. ; This work was partially supported by CONSOLIDER-INGENIO 2010 under grant CSD2007-00022 and by the Spanish government and GVA funds under TIN2006- 14630-C0301 and PROMETEO/2008/051 projects.
The final publication is available at Springer via http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10796-014-9524-3 ; [EN] In open multi-agent systems, agents can enter or leave the system, interact, form societies, and have dependency relations with each other. In these systems, when agents have to collaborate or coordinate their activities to achieve their objectives, their different interests and preferences can come into conflict. Argumentation is a powerful technique to harmonise these conflicts. However, in many situations the social context of agents determines the way in which agents can argue to reach agreements. In this paper, we advance research in the computational representation of argumentation frameworks by proposing a new ontologicalbased, knowledge-representation formalism for the design of open MAS in which the participating software agents are able to manage and exchange arguments with each other taking into account the agents' social context. This formalism is the core of a case-based argumentation framework for agent societies. In addition, we present an example of the performance of the formalism in a real domain that manages the requests received by the technicians of a call centre. ; This work is supported by the Spanish government grants [CONSOLIDER-INGENIO 2010 CSD2007-00022, TIN2011-27652-C03-01, and TIN2012-36586-C03-01] and by the GVA project [PROMETEO II/2013/019]. ; Heras Barberá, SM.; Botti, V.; Julian Inglada, VJ. (2014). An Ontological-based Knowledge-Representation Formalism for Case-Based Argumentation. Information Systems Frontiers. 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-014-9524-3 ; S ; 1 ; 20 ; Amgoud, L. (2005). An argumentation-based model for reasoning about coalition structures. In 2nd international workshop on argumentation in multi-agent systems, argmas-05(pp. 1–12). Springer. ; Amgoud, L., Dimopolous, Y., Moraitis, P. (2007). A unified and general framework for argumentation-based negotiation. In 6th international joint conference on autonomous agents and multiagent systems, AAMAS-07. ...
[EN] In real-time Multi-Agent Systems, Real-Time Agents merge intelligent deliberative techniques with real-time reactive actions in a distributed environment. CBR has been successfully applied in Multi-Agent Systems as deliberative mechanism for agents. However, in the case of Real-Time Multi-Agent Systems the temporal restrictions of their Real-Time Agents make their deliberation process to be temporally bounded. Therefore, this paper presents a guide to temporally bound the CBR to adapt it to be used as deliberative mechanism for Real-Time Agents. ; This work was partially supported by CONSOLIDERINGENIO 2010 under grant CSD2007-00022 and by the Spanish government and GVA funds under TIN2006- 14630-C0301 and PROMETEO/2008/051 projects. ; Navarro Llácer, M.; Heras Barberá, SM.; Julian Inglada, VJ. (2009). Guidelines to apply CBR in Real-Time Multi-Agent Systems. Journal of Physical Agents. 3(3):39-43. https://doi.org/10.14198/JoPha.2009.3.3.07 ; S ; 39 ; 43 ; 3 ; 3
[EN] This paper briefly introduces a summary of the special session on Hybrid Reasoning and Coordination Methods on Multi-Agent Systems, held in conjunction with the 4th International Conference on Hybrid Artificial Intelligence Systems 2009 (HAIS'09). The research papers of this session have been revised and extended and the final results are published in this journal special issue. ; This special session was supported by CONSOLIDERINGENIO 2010 under grant CSD2007-00022 and by the Spanish government and GVA funds under TIN2006-14630-C0301 and PROMETEO/2008/051 projects. ; Heras Barberá, SM.; Navarro Llácer, M.; Julian Inglada, VJ. (2009). Hybrid Reasoning and Coordination Methods on Multi-Agent Systems. Journal of Physical Agents. 3(3):1-2. https://doi.org/10.14198/JoPha.2009.3.3.01 ; S ; 1 ; 2 ; 3 ; 3
Besides the simpler ability to interact, open multi-agent systems must include mechanisms for their agents to reach agreements by taking into account their social context. Argumentation provides multi-agent systems with a framework that assures a rational communication, which allows agents to reach agreements when conflicts of opinion arise. In this paper, we present the dialogue protocol that agents of a case-based argumentation framework can use to interact when they engage in argumentation dialogues. The syntax and semantics of the argumentation protocol are formalised and discussed. To illustrate our proposal, we have applied the protocol in the context of a water market. By using our dialogue protocol, agents represent water users that are able to explore different water allocations and justify their views about what is the best water distribution in a certain environment. ; This work is supported by the Spanish government Grants CONSOLIDER INGENIO 2010 CSD2007-00022, MINECO/FEDER TIN2012-36586-C03-01, and MICINN TIN2011-27652-C03-01. ; Heras Barberá, SM.; Botti Navarro, VJ.; Julian Inglada, VJ. (2014). Modelling dialogues in agent societies. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence. 34:208-226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2014.06.003 ; S ; 208 ; 226 ; 34
In this paper, we present an abstract argumentation framework for the support of agreement processes in agent societies. It takes into account arguments, attacks among them, and the social context of the agents that put forward arguments. Then, we de¿ne the semantics of the framework, providing a mechanism to evaluate arguments in view of other arguments posed in the argumentation process. We also provide a translation of the framework into a neural network that computes the set of acceptable arguments and can be tuned to give more or less importance to argument attacks. Finally, the framework is illustrated with an example in a real domain of a water-rights transfer market. & 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved ; This work is supported by the Spanish government Grants CONSOLIDER INGENIO 2010 CSD2007-00022, TIN2008-04446 and TIN2009-13839-C03-01 and by the GVA project PROMETEO 2008/051. ; Heras Barberá, SM.; Botti Navarro, VJ.; Julian Inglada, VJ. (2012). Argument-based agreements in agent societies. Neurocomputing. 75(1):156-162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2011.02.022 ; S ; 156 ; 162 ; 75 ; 1
[EN] The application of argumentation theories and techniques in multi-agent systems has become a prolific area of research. Argumentation allows agents to harmonise two types of disagreement situations: internal, when the acquisition of new information (e.g., about the environment or about other agents) produces incoherences in the agents' mental state; and external, when agents that have different positions about a topic engage in a discussion. The focus of this paper is on the latter type of disagreement situations. In those settings, agents must be able to generate, select and send arguments to other agents that will evaluate them in their turn. An efficient way for agents to manage these argumentation abilities is by using case-based reasoning, which has been successfully applied to argumentation from its earliest beginnings. This reasoning methodology also allows agents to learn from their experiences and therefore, to improve their argumentation skills. This paper analyses the advantages of applying case-based reasoning to manage arguments in multi-agent systems dialogues, identifies open issues and proposes new ideas to tackle them. ; This work was partially supported by CONSOLIDERINGENIO 2010 under grant CSD2007-00022 and by the Spanish government and FEDER funds under CICYT TIN2005-03395 and TIN2006-14630-C0301 projects. ; Heras Barberá, SM.; Julian Inglada, VJ.; Botti Navarro, VJ. (2010). Applying CBR to manage argumentation in MAS. International Journal of Reasoning-based Intelligent Systems. 2(2):110-117. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJRIS.2010.034906 ; S ; 110 ; 117 ; 2 ; 2
Open societies are situated in dynamic environments and are formed by heterogeneous autonomous agents. In order to ensure social order, norms have been employed as coordination mechanisms. However, the dynamical features of open systems may cause that norms loose their validity and need to be adapted. Therefore, this paper proposes a new dialogue game protocol for modelling the interactions produced between agents that must reach an agreement on the use of norms. An application example has been presented for showing both the performance of the protocol and its usefulness as a mechanism for managing the solving process of a coordination problem through norms. ; This work was partially supported by CONSOLIDER-INGENIO 2010 under grant CSD2007-00022, by the Spanish government and GVA funds under TIN2006-14630-C0301 and PROMETEO/2008/051 projects and by the FPU grant AP-2007-01256 awarded to N. Criado.
[EN] Nowadays, Multi-Agent Systems (MAS) are broadening their applications to open environments, where heterogeneous agents could enter into the system, form agents' organizations and interact. The high dynamism of open MAS gives rise to potential conflicts between agents and thus, to a need for a mechanism to reach agreements. Argumentation is a natural way of harmonizing conflicts of opinion that has been applied to many disciplines, such as Case-Based Reasoning (CBR) and MAS. Some approaches that apply CBR to manage argumentation in MAS have been proposed in the literature. These improve agents' argumentation skills by allowing them to reason and learn from experiences. In this paper, we have reviewed these approaches and identified the current contributions of the CBR methodology in this area. As a result of this work, we have proposed several open issues that must be taken into consideration to develop a CBR framework that provides the agents of an open MAS with arguing and learning capabilities. ; This work was partially supported by CONSOLIDER-INGENIO 2010 under grant CSD2007-00022 and by the Spanish government and FEDER funds under TIN2006-14630-C0301 project. ; Heras Barberá, SM.; Botti Navarro, VJ.; Julian Inglada, VJ. (2009). Challenges for a CBR framework for argumentation in open MAS. Knowledge Engineering Review. 24(4):327-352. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0269888909990178 ; S ; 327 ; 352 ; 24 ; 4 ; Willmott S. , Vreeswijk G. , Chesñevar C. , South M. , McGinnis J. , Modgil S. , Rahwan I. , Reed C. , Simari G. 2006. Towards an argument interchange format for multi-agent systems. In Proceedings of the AAMAS International Workshop on Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems, ArgMAS-06, 17–34. ; Sycara, K. P. (1990). Persuasive argumentation in negotiation. Theory and Decision, 28(3), 203-242. doi:10.1007/bf00162699 ; Ontañón S. , Plaza E. 2006. Arguments and counterexamples in case-based joint deliberation. In AAMAS-06 Workshop on Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems, ArgMAS-06, 36–53. ; Sadri F. , Toni F. , ...
327 352 24 4 ; S ; [EN] Nowadays, Multi-Agent Systems (MAS) are broadening their applications to open environments, where heterogeneous agents could enter into the system, form agents' organizations and interact. The high dynamism of open MAS gives rise to potential conflicts between agents and thus, to a need for a mechanism to reach agreements. Argumentation is a natural way of harmonizing conflicts of opinion that has been applied to many disciplines, such as Case-Based Reasoning (CBR) and MAS. Some approaches that apply CBR to manage argumentation in MAS have been proposed in the literature. These improve agents' argumentation skills by allowing them to reason and learn from experiences. In this paper, we have reviewed these approaches and identified the current contributions of the CBR methodology in this area. As a result of this work, we have proposed several open issues that must be taken into consideration to develop a CBR framework that provides the agents of an open MAS with arguing and learning capabilities. This work was partially supported by CONSOLIDER-INGENIO 2010 under grant CSD2007-00022 and by the Spanish government and FEDER funds under TIN2006-14630-C0301 project. Heras Barberá, SM.; Botti Navarro, VJ.; Julian Inglada, VJ. (2009). Challenges for a CBR framework for argumentation in open MAS. Knowledge Engineering Review. 24(4):327-352. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0269888909990178 Willmott S. , Vreeswijk G. , Chesñevar C. , South M. , McGinnis J. , Modgil S. , Rahwan I. , Reed C. , Simari G. 2006. Towards an argument interchange format for multi-agent systems. In Proceedings of the AAMAS International Workshop on Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems, ArgMAS-06, 17–34. Sycara, K. P. (1990). Persuasive argumentation in negotiation. Theory and Decision, 28(3), 203-242. doi:10.1007/bf00162699 Ontañón S. , Plaza E. 2006. Arguments and counterexamples in case-based joint deliberation. In AAMAS-06 Workshop on Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems, ArgMAS-06, 36–53. Sadri F. , Toni F. , Torroni P. 2001. ...
[EN] The automatic recipe recommendation which take into account the dietary restrictions of users (such as allergies or intolerances) is a complex and open problem. Some of the limitations of the problem is the lack of food databases correctly labeled with its potential allergens and non-unification of this information by companies in the food sector. In the absence of an appropriate solution, people affected by food restrictions cannot use recommender systems, because this recommend them inappropriate recipes. In order to resolve this situation, in this article we propose a solution based on a collaborative multi-agent system, using negotiation and machine learning techniques, is able to detect and label potential allergens in recipes. The proposed system is being employed in receteame.com, a recipe recommendation system which includes persuasive technologies, which are interactive technologies aimed at changing users' attitudes or behaviors through persuasion and social influence, and social information to improve the recommendations ; This work was supported by the projects TIN2015-65515-C4-1-R and TIN2014-55206-R of the Spanish government and by the grant program for the recruitment of doctors for the Spanish system of science and technology (PAID-10-14) of the Universitat Politecnica de Valencia. ; Alemany-Bordera, J.; Heras Barberá, SM.; Palanca Cámara, J.; Julian Inglada, VJ. (2016). Bargaining agents based system for automatic classification of potential allergens in recipes. ADCAIJ : Advances in Distributed Computing and Artificial Intelligence Journal. 5(2):43-51. https://doi.org/10.14201/ADCAIJ2016524351 ; S ; 43 ; 51 ; 5 ; 2
[EN] The exponential growth of social networks makes fingerprint let by users on the Internet a great source of information, with data about their preferences, needs, goals, profile and social environment. These data are distributed across di↵erent sources of information (social networks, blogs, databases, etc.) that may contain inconsistencies and their accuracy is uncertain. Paradoxically, this unprecedented availability of heterogeneous data has meant that users have more information available than they actually are able to process and understand to extract useful knowledge from it. Therefore, new tools that help users in their decision-making processes within the network (e.g. which friends to contact with or which products to consume) are needed. In this paper, we show how we have used a graph-based model to extract and model data and transform it in valuable knowledge to develop a persuasive social recommendation system1. ; This work was partially supported by the project MINE-CO/FEDER TIN2012-365686-C03-01 of the Spanish government and by the Spanish Ministry of Education, Culture and Sports under the Program for R&D Valorisation and Joint Resources VLC/CAMPUS, as part of the Campus of International Excellence Program (Ref. SP20140788). ; Palanca Cámara, J.; Heras Barberá, SM.; Jorge Cano, J.; Julian Inglada, VJ. (2015). Towards persuasive social recommendation: knowledge model. ACM SIGAPP Applied Computing Review. 15(2):41-49. https://doi.org/10.1145/2815169.2815173 ; S ; 41 ; 49 ; 15 ; 2 ; Desel, J., Pernici, B., Weske, M. Mining Social Networks: Uncovering Interaction Patterns in Business Processes.Business Process Management, Berlin, vol. 3080, pp. 244--260 (2004) ; Adomavicius, G., Tuzhilin, A.: Toward the Next Generation of Recommender Systems: A Survey of the State-of-the-Art and Possible Extensions. IEEE Trans. on KDE 17(6) (2005) 734--749 ; X. Zhou, Y. Xu, Y. Li, A. Josang, and C. Cox, "The state-of-the-art in personalized recommender systems for social networking,"Artificial Intelligence ...
[EN] In multi-agent systems, agents perform complex tasks that require different levels of intelligence and give rise to interactions among them. From these interactions, conflicts of opinion can arise, especially when these systems become open, with heterogeneous agents dynamically entering or leaving the system. Therefore, agents willing to participate in this type of system will be required to include extra capabilities to explicitly represent and generate agreements on top of the simpler ability to interact. Furthermore, agents in multiagent systems can form societies, which impose social dependencies on them. These dependencies have a decisive influence in the way agents interact and reach agreements. Argumentation provides a natural means of dealing with conflicts of interest and opinion. Agents can reach agreements by engaging in argumentation dialogues with their opponents in a discussion. In addition, agents can take advantage of previous argumentation experiences to follow dialogue strategies and persuade other agents to accept their opinions. Our insight is that case-based reasoning can be very useful to manage argumentation in open multi-agent systems and devise dialogue strategies based on previous argumentation experiences. To demonstrate the foundations of this suggestion, this paper presents the work that we have done to develop case-based dialogue strategies in agent societies. Thus, we propose a case-based argumentation framework for agent societies and define heuristic dialogue strategies based on it. The framework has been implemented and evaluated in a real customer support application. ; This work is supported by the Spanish Government Grants [CONSOLIDER-INGENIO 2010 CSD2007-00022, and TIN2012-36586-C03-01] and by the GVA project [PROMETEO 2008/051]. ; Heras Barberá, SM.; Jordán Prunera, JM.; Botti, V.; Julian Inglada, VJ. (2013). Case-Based strategies for argumentation dialogues in agent societies. Information Sciences. 223:1-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2012.10.007 ; S ; 1 ; 30 ; 223
