Covid-19 pandemic significantly affects the community's social life. It does not only result in a health crisis but also an economic crisis. This condition requires a collaboration between the governments and the community as national integration. Recent political situation exhibits a decrease in the tense relationship between the state and the civil society. A transformation is necessary to compromise. Accordingly, the state and civil society should cooperate, help each other, and control each other. Pancasila, as an open ideology, should be implemented as a national life guideline to obtain the state goals amid this pandemic.
The purpose of this study is to find out more closely the millennial generation'sperspective on Pancasila. The founding fathers formulated Pancasila, which aims to direct the nation to achieve its goals and become an inclusive nationality. The position of Pancasila as a source of identity, personality, morality, and the course of national safety. Pancasila is one of the essential components in the concept of National Resilience in ideology that provides directions and guidelines for achieving national goals, namely the nation's survival and state. However, the fact is that the Pancasila Ideology position is now increasingly being forgotten by the Indonesian people, including the millennial generation with a large population. In the future, it will become the next generation. The fading of the appreciation and practice of Pancasila values is partly due to the various challenges facing the Indonesiannation. The method used is qualitative research with Conventional Content Analysis (CCA), the subject of this research is the millennial generation who live in DKI Jakarta. The results of this study are six categories describing the views of the millennial generation towards Pancasila, including: (1) Guidelines; The urgency of deepening Pancasila; (3) Interests; (4) The problem of understanding the values of Pancasila with two subcategories, namely language and no concrete examples; (5) Pancasila is synonymous with government; (6) Adaptive.
Abstrak -- Jakarta adalah episentrum pemerintahan, politik, bisnis dan ekonomi di Indonesia. Sehingga Jakarta menjadi wilayah multi etnis, suku, bangsa dan agama. Selain menjadi modal sosial hidup rukun, kondisi ini memiliki potensi benturan antar identitas. Indeks Demokrasi Indonesia sejak tahun 2014 mencatat Jakarta sebagai provinsi paling demokratis di Indonesia. Namun, pilgub DKI Jakarta 2017 menghasilkan ketegangan di masyarakat akibat isu SARA dan tindakan penistaan agama. Masyarakat pun terpolarisasi berdasarkan pilihan politik dan terjadi gerakan massa. Konflik dan tindak kekerasan pun terjadi, misalnya penolakan kampanye, penolakan mensholati jenazah pendukung pasangan lain. Akibatnya indeks demokrasi Jakarta tahun 2016 turun. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis potensi konflik yang muncul pada pelaksanaan pilgub tahun 2017 serta bagaimana peran yang dilakukan oleh badan kesatuan bangsa dan politik dalam melakukan upaya pencegahan konflik. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode kualitatif dengan pendekatan studi kasus. Data diperoleh dari informan yang ditetapkan, selanjutnya dianalisis dengan teknik analisa kualitatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa upaya pencegahan konflik dilakukan secara sinergi pemerintah daerah dan stakeholder terkait, sehingga potensi konflik dapat terdeteksi dan diredam sejak dini. Hasilnya di tengah polarisasi yang terjadi, pilgub berjalan aman dan lancar dengan tingkat partisipasi pemilu 75 – 77 % dari total DPT. Kesimpulan penelitian ini antara lain potensi konflik pada pilgub DKI Jakarta tahun 2017 meliputi isu SARA dan penistaan agama, netralitas ASN, profesionalitas penyelenggara pemilu, penyelenggaraan pemilu serta konflik kepentingan dan kekuasaan. Adapun peran Bakesbangpol dalam pencegahan konflik pilgub DKI Jakarta tahun 2017 terdiri dari meredam potensi konflik dan membangun sistem deteksi dan peringatan dini konflik.Kata kunci: peran, badan kesatuan bangsa dan politik, pencegahan, konflik, pemilihan gubernur Abstract -- Jakarta is government, politics, business, and economic epicentrum of Indonesia. Thus, Jakarta becomes multi-ethnical, tribe, and religion. In addition for being social capital in living in harmony, this condition has potential conflict among identities. Since 2014, Indonesia Democratic Index showed that Jakarta is the most democratic province in Indonesia. However, Governor election in 2017 occurred high tension in the society caused by SARA issue and religion insults. Finally, the society was polarized based on the political choice and occurred mass movement. Conflict and violence occurred, such as campaign rejection and rejection of praying to bones which support other governor candidate. This caused the decrease of Jakarta Democratic Index in 2016. This research aims to analyze potential conflict may appear on Governor election in 2017 and how the role of National United and Politics Board to prevent the conflicts. The research uses qualitative method and using case study approach. The data was obtained from determined informant, then analyzed with the qualitative technique. The research result shows that the effort of conflict prevention was implemented in line between local government and involved stakeholders, so conflict potency can be detected and dimmed earlier. Thus on the polarized condition, government election run well with 75-77% recapitulation level of total DPT. The conclusion of the research is conflict potency on Jakarta Governor election 2017 involved SARA issue and blasphemy, public servant neutrality, professionalism of election organizers, and conflict of interest and sovereignty. Then, the role of Bakesbangpol in involving conflict prevention in Jakarta Governor election consisted of muffling potential conflict, creating detection system, and conflict early warning. Key words: role, national united and politics board, prevention, conflict, governor election
Security comes from Latin, secures which means free from danger, fear, and threats which consist of traditional and non-traditional security approaches. Defense is defined as the main instrument of a country to create national security. National defense is defined as a dynamic condition of a country that covers all aspects of national life to deal with threats. National security encompasses the security of the state, society and individuals. There are still several definitions from several experts regarding the concepts of security and defense to date. This article analyses the forms of contemporary threats related to security and defense and explains their similarities and differences in the study of national resilience aimed at realizing a national security system and development of the national security system in other countries. This article uses a descriptive qualitative research design through literature study and interviews. This article explains that the forms of threats that occur in Indonesia include problems at the border area, SARA intolerance, inequality in bureaucratic reform, not optimal law enforcement, and transnational crime. Similarities and differences in the concepts of security and defense can be seen from the regulations, the concepts used, the institutions and the constitution. This article shows that national resilience is influenced by national defense and security. The safe condition of a country is inseparable from the security and defense factors alone but is synergized with each other factors such as economic, political, legal, social, cultural, ideological, geographic, demographic and natural resources.Keywords: defense, national security, national resilience, security
This paper aims to describe the Integrated Interdiction System's implementation in the National Narcotics Board to eradicate narcotics smuggling and illegal trafficking. Integrated Interdiction System is one of the actions included in government regulation called Instruksi Presiden Republik Indonesia Nomor 2 Tahun 2020 about national action plan to prevent and eradicate narcotics abuse and illegal trafficking (P4GN) 2020-2024. The theory used is the public policy analysis theory from William N. Dunn. At the phase of policy monitoring, used the social auditing approach. This paper used qualitative descriptive methods—primary data collected from interviews with the Integrated Interdiction System's implementor in National Narcotics Board. The secondary data collected from the literature study. This study's findings are the implementation of the Integrated Interdiction System fulfills three of four policy monitoring functions. Furthermore, concerned with the social auditing approach, Integrated Interdiction System fulfills the policy process of relations among input, process, output, and outcome.
