Suchergebnisse
Filter
10 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
Kausalität und Naturgesetz in der frühen Neuzeit
In: Studia Leibnitiana
In: Sonderhefte 31
Digitales Baustellenmanagement im Leitungsbau
In: Wasserwirtschaft, Wassertechnik: wwt ; Praxismagazin für Trink- und Abwassermanagement, Band 72, Heft 1-2, S. 43-46
ISSN: 1438-5716
Bürokratie abbauen, die Kommunikation zwischen den Beteiligten verbessern und administrative Prozesse verschlanken, sind zentrale Ziele der Initiative "Zukunft Leitungsbau". Die Praxis zeigt: Ansätze bei der Digitalisierung sind ebenso vielfältig wie zielführend.
Processes, pre-emption and further problems
In: Synthese: an international journal for epistemology, methodology and philosophy of science, Band 197, Heft 4, S. 1487-1509
ISSN: 1573-0964
Structuralism, causation and explanation
In: Synthese: an international journal for epistemology, methodology and philosophy of science, Band 194, Heft 7, S. 2251-2253
ISSN: 1573-0964
Spinoza, La Forge und das Problem der Modi
In: Methodus: revista internacional de filosofía moderna : international journal for modern philosophy, Band 8, Heft 8, S. 33-55
ISSN: 0719-0220
New work in metaphysics of science: Anna Marmodoro (ed.): The metaphysics of powers: Their grounding and their manifestations. New York: Routledge, 2010, viii+196pp, £90.00 HB Helen Beebee and Nigel Sabbarton-Leary (eds): The semantics and metaphysics of natural kinds. New York: Routledge, 2010, vii...
In: Metascience: an international review journal for the history, philosophy and social studies of science, Band 22, Heft 2, S. 275-282
ISSN: 1467-9981
Descartes' Kritik an den realen Qualitäten: das Beispiel der Schwere
In: Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie, Band 83, Heft 1
ISSN: 1613-0650
Are we free to make the laws?
In: Synthese: an international journal for epistemology, methodology and philosophy of science, Band 200, Heft 1
ISSN: 1573-0964
AbstractHumeans about laws maintain that laws of nature are nothing over and above the complete distribution of non-modal, categorical properties in spacetime. 'Humean compatibilists' argue that if Humeanism about laws is true, then agents in a deterministic world can do otherwise than they are lawfully determined to do because of the distinctive nature of Humean laws. More specifically, they reject a central premise of the Consequence argument by maintaining that deterministic laws of nature are 'up to us'. In this paper, we present a new argument for Humean compatibilism. We argue that Humeans about laws indeed have resources for defending compatibilism that non-Humeans lack (though not for the reasons typically discussed in the literature). Moreover, we show that utilizing these resources does not lead to objectionable consequences. Humeans about laws should thus embrace Humean compatibilism.
Erratum to: Metaphysics, prescription and methodological disagreement: A comment on Mathias Frisch's Causal reasoning in physics
In: Metascience: an international review journal for the history, philosophy and social studies of science, Band 25, Heft 2, S. 339-339
ISSN: 1467-9981