Suchergebnisse

The authors regret that Table 2 of the article (ZENETOS et al., 2011) contained some errors. The errors pertain to nomenclature changes and the distribution/establishment success of alien species in the Mediterranean MSFD areas.

The state-of-art on alien species in the Mediterranean Sea is presented, making distinctions among the four subregions defined in the EU Marine Strategy Framework Directive: (i) the Western Mediterranean Sea (WMED); (ii) the Central Mediterranean Sea (CMED); (iii) the Adriatic Sea (ADRIA); and (iv) the Eastern Mediterranean Sea (EMED). The updated checklist (December 2010) of marine alien species within each subregion, along with their acclimatization status and origin, is provided. A total of 955 alien species is known in the Mediterranean, the vast majority of them having being introduced in the EMED (718), less in the WMED (328) and CMED (267) and least in the Adriatic (171). Of these, 535 species (56%) are established in at least one area. Despite the collective effort of experts who attempted in this work, the number of introduced species remains probably underestimated. Excluding microalgae, for which knowledge is still insufficient, aliens have increased the total species richness of the Mediterranean Sea by 5.9%. This figure should not be directly read as an indication of higher biodiversity, as spreading of so many aliens within the basin is possibly causing biotic homogenization. Thermophilic species, i.e. Indo-Pacific, Indian Ocean, Red Sea, Tropical Atlantic, Tropical Pacific, and circum(sub)tropical, account for 88.4% of the introduced species in the EMED, 72.8% in the CMED, 59.3% in the WMED and 56.1% in the Adriatic. Cold water species, i.e. circumboreal, N Atlantic, and N Pacific, make up a small percentage of the introduced species, ranging between 4.2% and 21.6% and being more numerous in the Adriatic and less so in the EMED. Species that are classified as invasive or potentially invasive are 134 in the whole of the Mediterranean: 108 are present in the EMED, 76 in the CMED, 53 in the Adriatic and 64 in the WMED. The WMED hosts most invasive macrophytes, whereas the EMED has the lion's share in polychaetes, crustaceans, molluscs and fish.

© The Author(s), 2021. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License. The definitive version was published in Özpolat, B. D., Randel, N., Williams, E. A., Bezares-Calderón, L. A., Andreatta, G., Balavoine, G., Bertucci, P. Y., Ferrier, D. E. K., Gambi, M. C., Gazave, E., Handberg-Thorsager, M., Hardege, J., Hird, C., Hsieh, Y.-W., Hui, J., Mutemi, K. N., Schneider, S. Q., Simakov, O., Vergara, H. M., Vervoort, H., Jekley, G., Tessmar-Raible, K., Raible, F., Arendt, D. The Nereid on the rise: Platynereis as a model system. EvoDevo, 12(1), (2021): 10, https://doi.org/10.1186/s13227-021-00180-3. ; The Nereid Platynereis dumerilii (Audouin and Milne Edwards (Annales des Sciences Naturelles 1:195–269, 1833) is a marine annelid that belongs to the Nereididae, a family of errant polychaete worms. The Nereid shows a pelago-benthic life cycle: as a general characteristic for the superphylum of Lophotrochozoa/Spiralia, it has spirally cleaving embryos developing into swimming trochophore larvae. The larvae then metamorphose into benthic worms living in self-spun tubes on macroalgae. Platynereis is used as a model for genetics, regeneration, reproduction biology, development, evolution, chronobiology, neurobiology, ecology, ecotoxicology, and most recently also for connectomics and single-cell genomics. Research on the Nereid started with studies on eye development and spiralian embryogenesis in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. Transitioning into the molecular era, Platynereis research focused on posterior growth and regeneration, neuroendocrinology, circadian and lunar cycles, fertilization, and oocyte maturation. Other work covered segmentation, photoreceptors and other sensory cells, nephridia, and population dynamics. Most recently, the unique advantages of the Nereid young worm for whole-body volume electron microscopy and single-cell sequencing became apparent, enabling the tracing of all neurons in its rope-ladder-like central nervous system, and the construction of multimodal cellular atlases. Here, we provide an overview of current topics and methodologies for P. dumerilii, with the aim of stimulating further interest into our unique model and expanding the active and vibrant Platynereis community. ; Funding resources are shown after author initials. EAW: BBSRC David Phillips Fellowship BB/T00990X/1. BDÖ: NIH NIGMS MIRA 1R35GM138008-01; NSF-EDGE Award no 1923429; Hibbitt Startup Funds. GJ, LABC, CH: Wellcome Trust Investigator Award 214337/Z/18/Z. KNM: Marie Sklodowska-Curie fellow supported by the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No. 766053, project EvoCELL. NR: European Union Horizon 2020, Marie Skłodowska-Curie Grant No 838225. MCG: Stazione Zoologica A. Dohrn (Napoli) and the Ischia Marine Center technical staff; Open University PhD programme; ASSEMBLE; PON-MODO project (Campania Region, Italy), RITMARE - Flag project, Italy; MARES Consortium. Thanks to the ECCSEL - NatLab Italy facilities, managed by the OGS (Trieste), to support collection at Panarea and Vulcano islands. JDH: NERC award NE/T001577/1. MHT: Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG), Grant Number TO563/7-1. EG and MV: Labex 'Who Am I?' (No. ANR-11-LABX-0071) funded by the French Government through its 'Investments for the Future' program operated by the ANR under Grant No. ANR-11-IDEX-0005-01, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (DBM Grant), Université de Paris (IDEX Emergence grant 2020), Agence Nationale de la Recherche (Grant TELOBLAST no. ANR-16-CE91-0007; Grant STEM No. ANR-19-CE27-0027-02), the «Association pour la Recherche sur le Cancer» (Grant PJA 20191209482), and the «Ligue Nationale Contre le Cancer» (Grant RS20/75-20). SQS: NSF (US) Award IOS-1455185, MOST (TW) 108-2311-B-001-002-MY3, Academia Sinica Career Development Award AS-CDA-110-L02, and the Institute of Cellular and Organismic Biology (ICOB) of Academia Sinica (TW). YWH: Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG), grant number TO563/7-1 (to Pavel Tomancak). OS: Austrian Science Fund Grant P32190. GB: The Balavoine Lab was funded by the CNRS, the Université de Paris and grants from the ANR (TELOBLAST no. ANR-16-CE91-0007) and from the ARC (PJA 20181208248). FR and KTR: The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Research Council under the European Community's Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007–2013)/ERC Grant Agreement 260304 (F.R.) and ERC Grant Agreement 337011 (K.T.-R.); the Horizon 2020 Programme ERC Grant Agreement 81995 (K.T.-R.); the research platforms 'Rhythms of Life' (K.T.-R., F.R.) and "Single-cell genomics of stem cells" (F.R.) of the University of Vienna; the Austrian Science Fund (FWF) START award, project Y413 (K.T.-R.); the Austrian Science Fund (FWF) projects P28970 (K.T.-R.) and I2972 (F.R.); the Austrian Science Fund (FWF) grant F78 (K.T.-R., F.R.). DA and PB ERC Advanced grant NeuralCellTypeEvo #788921.

More than 60 marine non-indigenous species (NIS) have been removed from previous lists and 84 species have been added, bringing the total to 986 alien species in the Mediterranean [775 in the eastern Mediterranean (EMED), 249 in the central Mediterranean (CMED), 190 in the Adriatic Sea (ADRIA) and 308 in the western Mediterranean (WMED)]. There were 48 new entries since 2011 which can be interpreted as approximately one new entry every two weeks. The number of alien species continues to increase, by 2-3 species per year for macrophytes, molluscs and polychaetes, 3-4 species per year for crustaceans, and 6 species per year for fish. The dominant group among alien species is molluscs (with 215 species), followed by crustaceans (159) and polychaetes (132). Macrophytes are the leading group of NIS in the ADRIA and the WMED, reaching 26-30% of all aliens, whereas in the EMED they barely constitute 10% of the introductions. In the EMED, molluscs are the most species-rich group, followed by crustaceans, fish and polychaetes. More than half (54%) of the marine alien species in the Mediterranean were probably introduced by corridors (mainly Suez). Shipping is blamed directly for the introduction of only 12 species, whereas it is assumed to be the most likely pathway of introduction (via ballasts or fouling) of another 300 species. For approximately 100 species shipping is a probable pathway along with the Suez Canal and/or aquaculture. Approximately 20 species have been introduced with certainty via aquaculture, while >50 species (mostly macroalgae), occurring in the vicinity of oyster farms, are assumed to be introduced accidentally as contaminants of imported species. A total of 18 species are assumed to have been introduced by the aquarium trade. Lessepsian species decline westwards, while the reverse pattern is evident for ship-mediated species and for those introduced with aquaculture. There is an increasing trend in new introductions via the Suez Canal and via shipping. ; The research leading to these results ...