Suchergebnisse

IntroductionThe aim of this study was to determine factors associated with lack of serological response (LSR) to treatment of syphilis among HIV‐infected subjects.Materials and MethodsRetrospective, longitudinal study on HIV‐infected subjects diagnosed and treated for syphilis and with an assessable serological response between 1 January 2004 and 15 September 2013. LSR was defined as a <4‐fold decline of rapid plasma reagin (RPR) titer or a failed reversion to nonreactive (if RPR ≤1:4 at diagnosis) after one year since treatment. Diagnoses of syphilis were staged in early syphilis (primary, secondary and early latent) or late syphilis (tertiary and late latent) according to clinical examination and patient's history. Syphilis was classified in new infections [NI: positive RPR and TPHA (Treponema pallidum Haemagglutination assay) titers in subjects without previous history of syphilis] or re‐infections [ReI: a ≥4‐fold increase of RPR titer in subjects previously successfully treated for syphilis]. Syphilis treatment was prescribed according to CDC guidelines. The crude incidence rates (IRs) of LSR were calculated per 1000‐person months of follow‐up (PMFU) as the total number of LSR episodes divided by the cumulative time contributed by all subjects (interval time since each syphilis diagnosis and the date of ascertainment of response). Results are described as median (IQR) or frequency (%).Results565 diagnoses of syphilis with an assessable serological response in 421 patients; 458 (81%) were early syphilis, 189 (33%) were NI, 376 (67%) were ReI. At first, diagnosis of syphilis median age was 41 (36–47) years, 419 (99.5%) males, 391 (93%) MSM, HIV‐infected since 7.7 (3.5–12.9) years, 75 (18%) HCV or HBV co‐infected, 56 (13%) with a previous AIDS diagnosis, 82 (19%) antiretroviral treatment naïve, 102 (24%) with HIV‐RNA ≥50 cp/mL, CD4+=576 (437–749) cells/mm3, nadir CD4+=308 (194–406) cells/mm3. LSRs were observed in 70/565 (12.4%) treated syphilis. Incidence of LSR decreased over time [2004–2008 IR=25.1 (17.2–33.1)/1000 PMFU; 2009–2010 IR=21.1 (12.3–29.9)/1000 PMFU; 2011–2013 IR=10.6 (5.1–18.2)/1000 PMFU; Poisson regression: p=0.001]. Results of univariate and multivariate analysis on the risk of LSR are reported in Table 1.ConclusionsIn HIV‐infected subjects we observed 12% of LSR to treatment of syphilis. LSR was associated with an older age, late syphilis, lower nadir CD4+ and detectable HIV viral load.

IntroductionSwitching to a rilpivirine, tenofovir and emtricitabine (RTE) single‐tablet regimen (STR) has been evaluated in a limited number of virologically suppressed patients. The aim of this study was to describe clinical outcomes in HIV‐positive patients switched from a suppressive antiretroviral regimen to RTE STR in routine clinical practice.MethodsIn this retrospective study of antiretroviral‐treated patients with <50 copies of HIV RNA/mL switched to RTE STR, virological failure (VF) was defined as two consecutive measurements of ≥50 copies/mL or a single measurement of ≥50 copies/mL followed by any change in treatment. Treatment failure (TF) was defined as VF or discontinuation of the STR for any reason. Univariate mixed‐linear models were used to identify differences in laboratory parameters over time.Results and discussionThe analysis involved 307 patients (83% males) with a median age of 45.8 years (interquartile range (IQR 39.3–50.9), who were followed up for a median of 7.4 months (IQR 4.6–10.9). VF occurred in three patients (1%) switched from a protease inhibitor (PI)‐based regimen, after a median of 2.6 months (IQR 1.6–3.0), and TF in 34 patients (11%) after a median of three months (IQR 1.4–5.8), 24 of whom (71%) were receiving a PI‐based regimen at baseline. Overall, there was a slight but statistically significant improvement in the mean monthly change from baseline in CD4+ cell counts (p=0.027), the CD4+/CD8+ ratio (p=0.0001), and Hb (p=0.024), alanine amino transferase (ALT) (p=0.009), total bilirubin (p<0.0001), indirect bilirubin (p<0.0001), total cholesterol (p<0.0001) and triglyceride (p<0.0001) levels. There was also a slight but statistically significant increase in serum creatinine (p=0.0004), aspartate amino transferase (AST) (p=0.001) and liver fibrosis index (FIB‐4) (p=0.002), and a decrease in eGFRcreat (p<0.0001) and high‐density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol (p<0.0001) values. The study limitations include its retrospective design, the relatively short follow‐up, and the absence of data concerning the severity of clinical adverse events; however, it does provide new information concerning the laboratory changes that occur in patients switching from PI‐based or PI‐sparing regimens to RTE STR.ConclusionsThe study findings confirm the efficacy and safety in clinical practice of switching to RTE STR in virologically suppressed patients receiving other antiretrovirals.

IntroductionUnboosted atazanavir (ATV) including regimens have been investigated as a ritonavir‐sparing simplification strategy. No data are available on removal of one NRTI in subjects effectively treated with unboosted atazanavir+2NRTIs. We present the 48‐week virological efficacy and safety of unboosted atazanavir plus lamivudine (3TC) or emtricitabine (FTC) (lamivudine/emtricitabine/Reyataz©, LAREY Study).Materials and MethodsSingle arm, prospective, pilot study on HIV‐treated patients, HBsAg negative, with HIV‐RNA<50 cps/mL since at least 2 years, who switched from ATV+2NRTIs to ATV 400 mg QD +3TC or FTC. Virological failure was defined as 2 consecutive values of HIV‐RNA>50 cps/ml; viral blip was defined as a single HIV‐RNA value>50 cps/ml not subsequently confirmed. Results as median (IQR). Changes between baseline (BL) and week 48 assessed by the Wilcoxon signed rank test.ResultsForty patients enrolled: 75% males, 51 (47–54) years, 14% HCV co‐infected, infected with HIV since 16 (9–21) years, on antiretroviral therapy since 13 (5–16) years, with a nadir CD4+ of 254 (157–307) cells/mm3, virologically suppressed since 4.2 (2.2–5.4) years; 53 patients switched from a tenofovir (TDF)‐based regimens; ATV was associated with 3TC in 83% patients. No virological failures or discontinuations were observed; three patients had a single viral blip in the range 50–250 copies/mL; CD4+ increased from 610 (518–829) cells/mm3 at BL to 697 (579–858) cells/mm3 at week 48 [48‐week change: 39 (−63/+160) cells/mm3 p=0.081]. Three clinical events were observed (one herpes zoster, one pneumonia, one syphilis) in absence of renal lithiasis, AIDS‐defining or drug‐related events or death. Overall, significant 48‐week amelioration of ALP [BL: 83 (71–107) mg/dL; 48‐week change: −15 (−27/−8) mg/dL p<0.0001] and CKD‐EPI [BL: 100 (86–108) ml/min/1.73 m2; 48‐week change: 1.5 (−3/+8) ml/min/1.73 m2, p=0.042] were observed. Patients switching from TDF (Table 1) significantly improved CD4+, lymphocytes, hepatic profile, renal profile and ALP; these patients had also a modest but significant decrease in haemoglobin.ConclusionsSwitch from an unboosted atazanavir‐based regimen to ATV+3TC or FTC regimen was effective and safe in this small sample, supporting the hypothesis of a potential two‐steps de‐intensification (removal of ritonavir and removal of one NRTI) in patients on long‐lasting virological suppression.

IntroductionThe 48‐week interim analysis of the MODAT study showed that confirmed virologic failure (CVF) was more frequent in patients simplifying to ATV/r monotherapy compared to maintaining ATV/r‐based triple therapy. The DSMB recommended stopping study enrollment but continuing follow‐up of enrolled patients. We present the 96‐week efficacy analysis.Material and MethodsMulticentre, randomized, open‐label, non‐inferiority trial (non‐inferiority margin −10%). Treatment failure (TF) was defined as CVF (two consecutive HIV‐RNA >50 cp/mL) or discontinuation for any cause. In the monotherapy arm, patients with CVF re‐introduced their previous NRTIs and remained in the study if HIV‐RNA <50 copies/mL within 12 weeks of re‐intensification.Results101 patients evaluated (Figure 1): 85% males, 21% HCV‐positive, median (IQR) age of 42 (36–48) years, baseline CD4+ 576 (447–743) cells/µL. In the 96‐week analysis (ITT; TF=failure), efficacy was 64% (32/50) in the monotherapy arm and 63% (32/51) in the triple‐therapy arm (difference +1.3%, 95% CI −17.5–20.1). Fourteen patients in monotherapy and two in triple‐therapy arm had CVF; median HIV‐RNA was 136 (72–376) copies/mL. In monotherapy arm, no PI or NRTI associated resistance mutations were observed at CVF. All patients who re‐intensified re‐suppressed. In monotherapy arm, TF was more frequent in HCV‐co‐infected patients (64% vs 28%; p=0.041). In the secondary analysis (ITT; re‐intensification=success), 82% (41/50) in monotherapy arm and 63% (32/51) in triple‐therapy arm were on study at week 96 (difference +19.3%, 95% CI 2.2–36.3). SAEs occurred in four (8%) patients in the monotherapy arm (one left basal pneumonia, one acute coronary stenosis, one traumatic lesion, one nephrolithiasis) and two (4%) in the triple therapy arm (one sepsis, one renal failure). Drug‐related adverse events (AEs) leading to discontinuation were three (6%) in the monotherapy arm (two AEs occurred in patients after successful re‐intensification) and 12 (23.5%) in the triple‐therapy (p=0.023).ConclusionsDespite the small sample size, the primary 96‐week analysis showed that simplification to ATV/r monotherapy showed inferior efficacy to maintaining ATV/r triple‐therapy but appeared to be superior when re‐intensification was considered success.

IntroductionSerious non‐AIDS events (SNAE) are frequent in HIV patients receiving cART. Current CD4 count was shown to be more strongly associated with infective compared to not‐infective SNAE and unable to predict cardiovascular events. We investigated the relationship between baseline and current CD4 count and the risk of both infective and non‐infective SNAE in HIV‐positive patients according to current ART use.MethodsWe included all HIV‐positive persons enrolled in the ICONA Foundation Study cohort who had at least one follow‐up visit. SNAE were grouped in infective (pneumonia, sepsis, endocarditis and meningitis) and non‐infective (malignancies, chronic kidney disease, cardiovascular events, hepatic events and pancreatitis) aetiology. Incidence of these event groups were calculated overall and according to baseline and current CD4 count (grouped as 0–200, 201–350, 351–500, 501–750, and >750 cells/mm3). Participants' follow‐up accrued from the date of enrolment (baseline) to a diagnosis of SNAE or their last visit. An event was defined the first time one of the considered SNAE occurred so that each person contributed a single event. A Poisson regression model for each of the two endpoints was used.ResultsA total of 10,822 patients were included (25.3% females, 38.2% heterosexuals) and 26.6% had hepatitis co‐infections. Median age was 36 (IQR 31–42) years. Overall, 423 not‐infective and 385 infective SNAE were included. The most frequent non‐infective SNAE were malignancies (n=202) and the most frequent infective SNAE were pneumonia (n=289). Crude rates of non‐infective SNAE were 0.78, 1.08 and 0.80/100 PYFU, and those of infective SNAE were 1.00, 0.51 and 0.66/100 PYFU in ART naive, currently off and currently on ART patients, respectively. Higher current CD4 count was associated with reduced risk of both infective and non‐infective SNAE in naives and in patients on ART (Table 1). The association was less strong in the group which suspended ART (for non‐infective SNAE the p value for interaction between current log‐CD4 and ART‐status, p=0.004). Conversely, we found no association between baseline CD4 count and risk of non‐infective SNAE in people treated with ART (p value for interaction = 0.0001). When CVD were considered separately, there was no association with CD4 count (not shown).ConclusionsOur findings show that, differently from ART naive, in ART‐treated patients, non‐infective SNAE are predicted by current but not by baseline CD4, suggesting that immune restoration is crucial to prevent these events.

AbstractIntroductionTo assess the effectiveness of novel HIV curative strategies, "cure" trials require periods of closely monitored antiretroviral therapy (ART) analytical treatment interruptions (ATIs). We performed a systematic review and meta‐analysis to identify the impact of ATI with or without novel therapeutics in cure‐related studies on the time to viral re‐suppression following ART restart.MethodsMedline, Embase and Web of Science databases were searched for human studies involving ATIs from 1 January 2015 till 22 April 2024. The primary outcome was time to first viral re‐suppression (plasma HIV viral load [VL] <50 copies/ml) stratified by receipt of interventional drug with ATI (IA) or ATI‐only groups. Random‐effects proportional meta‐analysis and multivariable Cox proportional hazards analysis were performed using R.ResultsOf 1073 studies screened, 13 were included that met the inclusion criteria with VL data available after restarting ART (n = 213 participants). There was no difference between time to viral suppression in IA or ATI‐only cohorts (p = 0.22). For 87% of participants, viral suppression within 12 weeks of ART restart was achieved, and all eventually had at least one VL <50 copies/ml during follow‐up. After adjusting for covariables, while participants in the IA cohort were associated with less rapid suppression (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.61, 95% CI 0.40–0.94, p = 0.026), other factors include greater log VL at ART restart (aHR 0.56, 95% CI 0.46–0.68, p<0.001), duration since HIV diagnosis (aHR 0.93, 95% CI 0.89–0.96) and longer intervals between HIV VL monitoring (aHR 0.66, 95% CI 0.59–0.74, p<0.001). However, the use of integrase inhibitors was associated with more rapid viral suppression (aHR 1.74, 95% CI 1.16–2.59).DiscussionWhen designing studies involving ATIs, information on time to viral re‐suppression after restarting ART is important to share with participants, and should be regularly monitored and reported, to assess the impact and safety of specific trial interventions in ATI studies.ConclusionsThe majority of participants achieved viral suppression after restarting ART in ATI studies. ART regimens containing integrase inhibitors and frequent VL monitoring should be offered for people restarting ART after ATI studies to ensure rapid re‐suppression.