The Third Indochina War and Southeast Asia
In: Contemporary Southeast Asia, Band 1, Heft 3, S. 268-292
ISSN: 0129-797X
68 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Contemporary Southeast Asia, Band 1, Heft 3, S. 268-292
ISSN: 0129-797X
World Affairs Online
Thailand's political problems attracted international attention when yellow shirted anti-Thaksin protestors closed down Bangkok's international airports in November 2008; the following April pro-Thaksin red shirts prevented an ASEAN-East Asia Summit, and clashed violently with the army in the streets of Bangkok. Conflict between groups for and against former Prime Minister Thaksin has polarized Thai society. Under his watch, violence also returned to the Malay Muslim south, with the loss of o
In: Policy studies 50
In: Trends in Southeast Asia, 2000,5
World Affairs Online
In: Journal of current Southeast Asian affairs, Band 37, Heft 3, S. 57-83
ISSN: 1868-4882
The United Malays National Organisation (UMNO) and its allies in the Barisan Nasional (BN) coalition, known as the Alliance until 1974, dominated Malaysian elections for more than six decades. UMNO's winning formula was based on massive support for the politically dominant Malay community, and mobilising government institutions in support of the party. This was undermined towards the end of the 1990s by UMNO disunity, a strengthened civil society, and arrival of a digital media. Demands for comprehensive political and economic reforms (reformasi) emerged following the controversial sacking of Deputy Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim in 1998. UMNO had its worst result ever in the 1999 election, a trend that continued in 2008 and 2013 when BN lost its popular and two-thirds majority. Najib's attempt to reverse this by strengthening the call for Malay dominance and tightening coercion failed. His deep implication in multiple corruption cases, tactical campaign errors, and a united opposition, Pakatan Harapan, led to the BN's stunning defeat. (JCSA/GIGA)
World Affairs Online
In: Contemporary Southeast Asia, Band 32, Heft 2, S. 234-257
ISSN: 0129-797X
Malaysia's policy towards southern Thailand has always required a balance between the country's internal security and concern about a neighbouring Muslim minority linked not only by religion but also ethnicity and culture. Security was a paramount concern at independence in 1957, with the southern provinces used as a base by the Communist Party of Malaya (CPM), the Communist Party of Thailand and Malay irredentists. But after Parti Islam made inroads against the ruling United Malays National Organization by capturing Kelantan (a state adjacent to Thailand) in the 1959 elections, the two premier Malay parties competed to present themselves as the protector of Thailand's Malay Muslims. Security concerns eased with the surrender of the CPM in 1989, but re-emerged in late 2001 with the resumption of conflict in southern Thailand, and the surfacing of militant Islamic groups in Malaysia. Though initially supportive of Thai security interests, Malaysias delicate balance swung towards focusing on the well-being of Thailand's Malays in 2004: the tragic 28 April Krue Se mosque and 25 October Tak Bai incidents led to strong Malaysian protests, an unprecedented parliamentary debate and a general willingness to push the envelope on intervention in Thailand's internal affairs. Tensions remained high through much of 2005, with Thailand alleging that Malaysia was complicit in southern violence. Nonetheless Malaysia ensured Thailand was not embarrassed in international forums such as the Organization of Islamic Conference or ASEAN, and relations improved late in the year. Changes in Thai policy after the September 2006 coup were largely welcomed in Malaysia, but since then Thai-Malaysian cooperation to address the problem has made little headway. (Contemp Southeast Asia/GIGA)
World Affairs Online
In: Contemporary Southeast Asia, Band 32, Heft 2, S. 234
In: Contemporary Southeast Asia, Band 32, Heft 2, S. 234-257
ISSN: 1793-284X
Malaysia's policy towards southern Thailand has always required a balance between the country's internal security & concern about a neighbouring Muslim minority linked not only by religion but also ethnicity & culture. Security was a paramount concern at independence in 1957, with the southern provinces used as a base by the Communist Party of Malaya (CPM), the Communist Party of Thailand & Malay irredentists. But after Parti Islam made inroads against the ruling United Malays National Organization by capturing Kelantan (a state adjacent to Thailand) in the 1959 elections, the two premier Malay parties competed to present themselves as the protector of Thailand's Malay Muslims. Security concerns eased with the surrender of the CPM in 1989, but re-emerged in late 2001 with the resumption of conflict in southern Thailand, & the surfacing of militant Islamic groups in Malaysia. Though initially supportive of Thai security interests, Malaysia's delicate balance swung towards focusing on the well-being of Thailand's Malays in 2004: the tragic 28 April KrueSe mosque & 25 October Tak Bai incidents led to strong Malaysian protests, an unprecedented parliamentary debate & a general willingness to push the envelope on intervention in Thailand's internal affairs. Tensions remained high through much of 2005, with Thailand alleging that Malaysia was complicit in southern violence. Nonetheless Malaysia ensured Thailand was not embarrassed in international forums such as the Organization of Islamic Conference or ASEAN, & relations improved late in the year. Changes in Thai policy after the September 2006 coup were largely welcomed in Malaysia, but since then Thai-Malaysian cooperation to address the problem has made little headway. Adapted from the source document.
In: Australian journal of international affairs: journal of the Australian Institute of International Affairs, Band 58, Heft 2, S. 296-299
ISSN: 1035-7718
In: Democratization, Band 10, Heft 1, S. 207-208
ISSN: 1351-0347
In: Australia and security cooperation in the Asia Pacific: AUS-CSCAP newsletter, Heft 15, S. 17-19
ISSN: 1327-0125
In: Democratization, Band 10, Heft 1, S. 207
ISSN: 1351-0347
In: Southeast Asian affairs, Band 2002, Heft 1, S. 305-325
ISSN: 1793-9135