Used‐Clothing Donations and Apparel Production in Africa
In: The economic journal: the journal of the Royal Economic Society, Band 118, Heft 532, S. 1764-1784
ISSN: 1468-0297
9 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: The economic journal: the journal of the Royal Economic Society, Band 118, Heft 532, S. 1764-1784
ISSN: 1468-0297
In: Journal of development economics, Band 81, Heft 2, S. 259-298
ISSN: 0304-3878
In: World development: the multi-disciplinary international journal devoted to the study and promotion of world development, Band 34, Heft 9, S. 1459-1481
In: World development: the multi-disciplinary international journal devoted to the study and promotion of world development, Band 34, Heft 9, S. 1459-1481
ISSN: 0305-750X
World Affairs Online
In: Journal of development economics, Band 81, Heft 2, S. 259-298
ISSN: 0304-3878
World Affairs Online
In: Economic Development and Cultural Change, Band 53, Heft 3, S. 585-617
ISSN: 1539-2988
In: NBER working paper series, 13222
This paper explores whether one of the most important U.S. policies towards Africa of the past few decades achieved its desired result. In 2000, the United States dropped trade restrictions on a broad list of products through the African Growth and Opportunity Act (AGOA). Since the Act was applied to both countries and products, we estimate the impact with a triple difference-in-differences estimation, controlling for both country and product-level import surges at the time of onset. This approach allows us to better address the "endogeneity of policy" critique of standard difference-in-differences estimation than if either a country or a product-level analysis was performed separately. Despite the fact that the AGOA product list as chosen to not include "import-sensitive" products, and despite the general challenges of transaction costs in African countries, we find that AGOA has a large and robust impact on apparel imports into the U.S., as well as on the agricultural and manufactured products covered by AGOA. These import responses grew over time and were the largest in product categories where the tariffs removed were large. AGOA did not result in a decrease in exports to Europe in these product categories, suggesting that the U.S.-AGOA imports were not merely diverted from elsewhere. We discuss how the effects vary across countries and the implications of these findings for aggregate export volumes.
World Affairs Online
In: NBER Working Paper No. w13222
SSRN
SSRN
Working paper