Intro -- Contents -- Figures -- Tables -- Acknowledgments -- Introduction -- Ch. 1. Marketing, Membership, and Merchandise: The Klan Brand Comes to Town -- Ch. 2. The Knights in Image and Idea: Popular Klannish Fantasy, Self-Portrayal, and Political Demonology -- Ch. 3 An Everyman's Klan: Behind the Masks in Newaygo County -- Ch. 4. The Invisible Empire and Small-Town Sociability: Klan Recruitment Channels in Newaygo County -- Ch. 5 Community, Church, and Klan: The Civic Lives of Ordinary Klansfolk and the Social Functions of KKK Pageantry -- Epilogue -- Notes -- Bibliography -- Index.
Zugriffsoptionen:
Die folgenden Links führen aus den jeweiligen lokalen Bibliotheken zum Volltext:
In: Fox, Craig R. and Gülden Ülkümen (2011), "Distinguishing Two Dimensions of Uncertainty," in Essays in Judgment and Decision Making, Brun, W., Kirkebøen, G. and Montgomery, H., eds. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
Front Cover -- Copyright Information -- Table of Contents -- Editors' Note -- Reducing the health toll from U.S. workplace stress -- Together from afar: Introducting a diary contact technique for improving intergroup relations -- Rebuilding trust between policy & -- communities through procedural justice & -- reconciliation -- How behavioral science can empower parents to improve children's educational outcomes -- Does changing defaults save lives? Effects of presumed consent organ donation policies -- Appendix -- Editorial Policy -- Back Cover.
Verfügbarkeit an Ihrem Standort wird überprüft
Dieses Buch ist auch in Ihrer Bibliothek verfügbar:
Front Cover -- Copyright Information -- Table of Contents -- Editors' Note -- The Costs of Poor Health (Plan Choices) & Prescriptions for Reform -- Improving Voting Systems' User-Friendliness, Reliability, & Security -- Behaviorally Informed Policies for Household Financial Decisionmaking -- Behavioral Policy Interventions to Address Education Inequality -- A Behavioral Blueprint for Improving Health Care Policy -- Behavioral Science Tools to Strengthen Energy & Environmental Policy -- Overcoming Behavioral Obstacles to Escaping Poverty -- Increasing Benefits & Reducing Social Costs of Technological Innovations -- Back Cover.
Zugriffsoptionen:
Die folgenden Links führen aus den jeweiligen lokalen Bibliotheken zum Volltext:
In: Tannenbaum, David, Craig R. Fox, and Gülden Ülkümen (2017), "Judgment Extremity and Accuracy under Epistemic versus Aleatory Uncertainty," Management Science, 63(2) (February), 497-518.
In: Ülkümen, Gülden, Craig R. Fox, and Bertram F. Malle (2016), "Two Dimensions of Subjective Uncertainty: Clues from Natural Language," Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 145(10), 1280-1297.
In: Krijnen, Job, Gülden Ülkümen, Jonathan Bogard, and Craig Fox (2022) "Lay Theories of Financial Well-being Predict Political and Policy Message Preferences," Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 122(2), 310-336.
High acceptance of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines is instrumental to ending the pandemic. Vaccine acceptance by subgroups of the population depends on their trust in COVID-19 vaccines. We surveyed a probability-based internet panel of 7832 adults from December 23, 2020-January 19, 2021 about their likelihood of getting a COVID-19 vaccine and the following domains of trust: an individual's generalized trust, trust in COVID-19 vaccine's efficacy and safety, trust in the governmental approval process and general vaccine development process for COVID-19 vaccines, trust in their physician about COVID-19, and trust in other sources about COVID-19. We included identified at-risk subgroups: healthcare workers, older adults (65-74-year-olds and≥75-year-olds), frontline essential workers, other essential workers, and individuals with high-risk chronic conditions. Of 5979 respondents, only 57.4% said they were very likely or somewhat likely to get a COVID-19 vaccine. More hesitant respondents (p<0.05) included: women, young adults (18-49years), Blacks, individuals with lower education, those with lower income, and individuals without high-risk chronic conditions. Lack of trust in the vaccine approval and development processes explained most of the demographic variation in stated vaccination likelihood, while other domains of trust explained less variation. We conclude that hesitancy for COVID-19 vaccines is high overall and among at-risk subgroups, and hesitancy is strongly tied to trust in the vaccine approval and development processes. Building trust is critical to ending the pandemic.
High acceptance of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines is instrumental to ending the pandemic. Vaccine acceptance by subgroups of the population depends on their trust in COVID-19 vaccines. We surveyed a probability-based internet panel of 7832 adults from December 23, 2020-January 19, 2021 about their likelihood of getting a COVID-19 vaccine and the following domains of trust: an individual's generalized trust, trust in COVID-19 vaccine's efficacy and safety, trust in the governmental approval process and general vaccine development process for COVID-19 vaccines, trust in their physician about COVID-19, and trust in other sources about COVID-19. We included identified at-risk subgroups: healthcare workers, older adults (65-74-year-olds and≥75-year-olds), frontline essential workers, other essential workers, and individuals with high-risk chronic conditions. Of 5979 respondents, only 57.4% said they were very likely or somewhat likely to get a COVID-19 vaccine. More hesitant respondents (p<0.05) included: women, young adults (18-49years), Blacks, individuals with lower education, those with lower income, and individuals without high-risk chronic conditions. Lack of trust in the vaccine approval and development processes explained most of the demographic variation in stated vaccination likelihood, while other domains of trust explained less variation. We conclude that hesitancy for COVID-19 vaccines is high overall and among at-risk subgroups, and hesitancy is strongly tied to trust in the vaccine approval and development processes. Building trust is critical to ending the pandemic.
In: Reiff, J. S., Zhang, J., Gallus, J., Dai, H., Pedley, N., Vangala, S., Leuchter, R., Goshgarian, G., Fox, C. R., Han, M., & Croymans, D. (2022). When peer comparison information harms physician well-being. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 119 (29).
Purpose To evaluate if nudges delivered by text message prior to an upcoming primary care visit can increase influenza vaccination rates. Design Randomized, controlled trial. Setting Two health systems in the Northeastern US between September 2020 and March 2021. Subjects 74,811 adults. Interventions Patients in the 19 intervention arms received 1-2 text messages in the 3 days preceding their appointment that varied in their format, interactivity, and content. Measures Influenza vaccination. Analysis Intention-to-treat. Results Participants had a mean (SD) age of 50.7 (16.2) years; 55.8% (41,771) were female, 70.6% (52,826) were White, and 19.0% (14,222) were Black. Among the interventions, 5 of 19 (26.3%) had a significantly greater vaccination rate than control. On average, the 19 interventions increased vaccination relative to control by 1.8 percentage points or 6.1% ( P = .005). The top performing text message described the vaccine to the patient as "reserved for you" and led to a 3.1 percentage point increase (95% CI, 1.3 to 4.9; P < .001) in vaccination relative to control. Three of the top five performing messages described the vaccine as "reserved for you." None of the interventions performed worse than control. Conclusions Text messages encouraging vaccination and delivered prior to an upcoming appointment significantly increased influenza vaccination rates and could be a scalable approach to increase vaccination more broadly.