Ionospheric studies by in situ measurements in sounding rockets
In: NDRE report 59
27 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: NDRE report 59
In: Norsk statsvitenskapelig tidsskrift, Band 30, Heft 4, S. 298-302
ISSN: 1504-2936
In: Norsk statsvitenskapelig tidsskrift, Band 28, Heft 1, S. 49-53
ISSN: 1504-2936
In: Norsk statsvitenskapelig tidsskrift, Band 28, Heft 1, S. 49-53
ISSN: 0801-1745
In: Tidsskrift for samfunnsforskning: TfS = Norwegian journal of social research, Band 52, Heft 2, S. 284-288
ISSN: 1504-291X
In: Nordisk østforum: tidsskrift for politikk, samfunn og kultur i Øst-Europa og Eurasia, Band 21, Heft 1, S. 25-42
ISSN: 1891-1773
In: Scandinavian journal of disability research, Band 2, Heft 2, S. 3-21
ISSN: 1745-3011
In: Journal of peace research, Band 29, Heft 3, S. 359-359
ISSN: 1460-3578
In: Arctic review on law and politics, Band 8
ISSN: 2387-4562
The Arctic Council has been criticized for its lack of legal status and, consequently, the supposedly low level of implementation among member states. Studying Norwegian implementation of six Arctic Council recommendations, this article challenges that view. I start by assuming that international law is not binary, that soft law is not a uniform phenomenon, and that soft law recommendations may entail certain characteristics—precision, monitoring, and stakeholder involvement—that can enhance their implementation nationally. Additionally, malignancy—an important barrier to national implementation—is taken into account. The Norwegian authorities have implemented several of the recommendations studied, and the characteristics are found to have a bearing on the outcomes. However, the absence of malignancy stands out as the most significant condition for achieving national implementation.(Published: May 2017)Citation: Ida Folkestad Soltvedt. "Soft Law, Solid Implementation? The Influence of Precision, Monitoring and Stakeholder Involvement on Norwegian Implementation of Arctic Council Recommendations." Arctic Review on Law and Politics, Vol. 8, 2017, pp. 73–94. http://dx.doi.org/10.23865/arctic.v8.639
The Arctic Council has been criticized for its lack of legal status and, consequently, the supposedly low level of implementation among member states. Studying Norwegian implementation of six Arctic Council recommendations, this article challenges that view. I start by assuming that international law is not binary, that soft law is not a uniform phenomenon, and that soft law recommendations may entail certain characteristics—precision, monitoring, and stakeholder involvement—that can enhance their implementation nationally. Additionally, malignancy—an important barrier to national implementation—is taken into account. The Norwegian authorities have implemented several of the recommendations studied, and the characteristics are found to have a bearing on the outcomes. However, the absence of malignancy stands out as the most significant condition for achieving national implementation.(Published: May 2017)Citation: Ida Folkestad Soltvedt. "Soft Law, Solid Implementation? The Influence of Precision, Monitoring and Stakeholder Involvement on Norwegian Implementation of Arctic Council Recommendations." Arctic Review on Law and Politics, Vol. 8, 2017, pp. 73–94. http://dx.doi.org/10.23865/arctic.v8.639
BASE
In: Teologisk tidsskrift, Band 2, Heft 4, S. 314-336
ISSN: 1893-0271
In: Local government studies, S. 1-21
ISSN: 1743-9388
In: Arctic governance Volume 2
In: The International journal of construction education and research: a tri-annual publication of the Associated Schools of Construction, Band 12, Heft 1, S. 54-65
ISSN: 1550-3984, 1522-8150