Suchergebnisse

Monographic work of Corresponding Member of the Russian Academy of Sciences M.I. Kleandrov is a fully meaningful and critical analysis of the previous experience of judicial activity in the system of arbitration courts and, finally, in the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation, the Council of Judges of the Russian Federation, scientific activity as a chief researcher at the Institute of State and Law of the Russian Academy of Sciences, necessary to develop a new understanding of what new forms of fair justice should be. The solution of this problem, the author believes, is necessary in conditions of uncertainty of legal norms, within the framework of judicial discretion, with judicial law-making and rulemaking, the problems of evidence in court proceedings and in extreme situations (pandemics), solving problems related to the imposition of death sentences and the rapid introduction of artificial intelligence into judicial activity.

The purpose of the study. The article examines the problems of including electronic justice in the judicial activity in extreme conditions and the possibility of its implementation in the practice of protecting the constitutional rights and legitimate interests of individuals and legal entities in Russia and abroad. It is determined that, in accordance with UN General Assembly Resolution No. 74/306, adopted on September 11, 2020 at the 64th plenary meeting of the 74th session, "Comprehensive and coordinated responses to the coronavirus disease pandemic (COVID-19)", States must ensure that all human rights are respected, protected and respected in the fight against the pandemic in full compliance with their obligations and obligations under international law, including international humanitarian law and international human rights law, which follows from the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (article 4). It is established that the legal mechanism of restrictions, including in the. Conclusion. As a result of the conducted research, it is determined that the main problem associated with the development of electronic justice is that at the state level it is necessary to improve the mechanism for the administration of justice in extreme conditions. The solution of this problem requires the creation of a scientifically based and confirmed by world practice algorithm for correcting the legal norms of the current federal legislation, which forms the organizational and legal mechanism of justice, ensuring its functioning in extreme conditions. The use of this approach makes it possible to summarize the accumulated world experience of "electronic justice" in extreme situations, as well as domestic federal and regional experience, and to incorporate legal norms into the current legislation in the digital reality with respect for the constitutional rights and legitimate interests of citizens to implement fair justice.