The role of organizational justice in multi-source performance appraisal: theory-based applications and directions for research
In: Human resource management review, Band 9, Heft 1, S. 1-20
ISSN: 1053-4822
5 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Human resource management review, Band 9, Heft 1, S. 1-20
ISSN: 1053-4822
In: Compensation and benefits review, Band 37, Heft 2, S. 55-62
ISSN: 1552-3837
This article considers potential conflicts between the principles of equity, equality and need in perceptions of fairness regarding employee benefits, based on self-interest bias, and makes specific predictions regarding perceptions of distributive justice in specific benefit plans. It includes predictions regarding perceptions of procedural justice. A survey of 497 employees in seven Canadian organizations tested the predictions. Findings indicate that need is still an important criterion for assessing distributive justice in employee benefits, although the survey also found evidence of self-interest bias. Perceptions of procedural justice were found to be significantly higher in plans with extensive communication and employee participation in plan design. Organizations that take a proactive approach to understanding how employees determine their perceptions of procedural and distributive justice in employee benefits, and design a benefit plan accordingly, can potentially increase employees' perceptions of justice regarding employee benefits and reap associated benefits including improved employee retention, enhanced ability to hire and increased benefit satisfaction.
In: Journal of managerial psychology, Band 19, Heft 1, S. 19-40
ISSN: 1758-7778
The self‐interest and relational models of organizational justice were tested to explain the relationship between benefit plan type and organizational justice. Benefit plan types considered were flexible and traditional plans. In support of the self‐interest model employees in flexible benefit plans had significantly higher perceptions of procedural justice than employees in traditional benefit plans. There were no significant differences in perceptions of distributive justice between the plan types.
In: Occasional papers / Group of Thirty, 66
World Affairs Online
In: International journal of human resource management, Band 30, Heft 2, S. 306-336
ISSN: 1466-4399