British Year Book of International Law, 1933. London and New York: Oxford University Press, 1933. pp. vi, 246. Index. 16s
In: American journal of international law: AJIL, Band 27, Heft 4, S. 795-796
ISSN: 2161-7953
199 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: American journal of international law: AJIL, Band 27, Heft 4, S. 795-796
ISSN: 2161-7953
In: American journal of international law: AJIL, Band 27, Heft 4, S. 799-800
ISSN: 2161-7953
In: American journal of international law: AJIL, Band 51, Heft 2, S. 376-380
ISSN: 2161-7953
In: American journal of international law: AJIL, Band 51, Heft 1, S. 97-98
ISSN: 2161-7953
In: Proceedings of the annual meeting / American Society of International Law, Band 51, S. 42-56
ISSN: 2169-1118
In: American journal of international law: AJIL, Band 50, Heft 2, S. 293-312
ISSN: 2161-7953
The founding fifty years ago of a society to promote the establishment of international relations on the basis of law and justice was a step marking the progress that had been made at the beginning of the century in the age-long efforts to find a means of substituting reason for force in the settlement of international controversies. At that time arbitration was generally regarded as the most suitable and acceptable substitute for war. Great Britain and the United States had both heavily contributed to that conviction first by submitting to arbitration under the Jay Treaty of 1794
the numerous misunderstandings that developed in carrying out the provisions of the Peace Treaty of 1783, and then three-quarters of a century later in submitting to arbitration by the Treaty of Washington of 1871 the dangerous Alabama Claims dispute following the American Civil War.
In: American journal of international law, Band 50, S. 293-312
ISSN: 0002-9300
In: American journal of international law: AJIL, Band 49, Heft 4, S. 548-549
ISSN: 2161-7953
In: American journal of international law: AJIL, Band 49, Heft 2, S. 277-278
ISSN: 2161-7953
In: American journal of international law: AJIL, Band 48, Heft 4, S. 592-597
ISSN: 2161-7953
In: American journal of international law: AJIL, Band 48, Heft 1, S. 57-82
ISSN: 2161-7953
"The treaty-making power is an extraordinary power liable to abuse. Treaties make international law and also they make domestic law. Under our Constitution treaties become the supreme law of the land. They are indeed more supreme than ordinary laws, for congressional laws are invalid if they do not conform to the Constitution, whereas treaty law can override the Constitution. Treaties, for example, can take powers away from the Congress and give them to the President; they can take powers from the States and give them to the Federal Government or to some international body, and they can cut across the rights given the people by their constitutional Bill of Rights."
In: Proceedings of the annual meeting / American Society of International Law, Band 48, S. 128-141
ISSN: 2169-1118
In: American journal of international law: AJIL, Band 47, Heft 3, S. 511-511
ISSN: 2161-7953
In: American journal of international law: AJIL, Band 46, Heft 2, S. 375-375
ISSN: 2161-7953
In: American journal of international law: AJIL, Band 46, Heft 1, S. 185
ISSN: 2161-7953