Effects of Revenue Management Pricing Strategies on Perceived Fairness
In: Journal of hospitality marketing & management, Band 27, Heft 4, S. 424-442
ISSN: 1936-8631
12 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Journal of hospitality marketing & management, Band 27, Heft 4, S. 424-442
ISSN: 1936-8631
In: Journal of hospitality marketing & management, Band 19, Heft 7, S. 697-699
ISSN: 1936-8631
In: Journal of hospitality marketing & management, Band 18, Heft 4, S. 445-455
ISSN: 1936-8631
In: Environmental science and pollution research: ESPR, Band 28, Heft 35, S. 49014-49031
ISSN: 1614-7499
In: Journal of Tourism, Heritage & Services Marketing (JTHSM), 2020, Vol. 6, No. 3, pp. 59-63, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.4108431
SSRN
In: Journal of Tourism, Heritage & Services Marketing, Band 6, Heft 3, S. 59-63
Purpose: This study seeks to examine Las Vegas visitors' perception about security in Las Vegas and the perceived risks associated with traveling to Las Vegas following the One October mass shooting. It also aims to explore potential Las Vegas visitors' attitudes towards the proactive security measures implemented by Las Vegas resorts after the One October tragedy. Methods: The study is descriptive in nature. The data was collected through a web-based survey that comprised a national sample of 414 adults from the United States.
Results: The results indicate that despite the tragic One October mass shooting in Las Vegas and the associated media coverage, security is not a major concern for visitors to Las Vegas. The findings of this study also suggest that Las Vegas visitors approve of existing and emerging security procedures.
Implications: Findings point out to an opportunity to capitalize on the perceived enhanced security measures in Las Vegas and to put emphasis on addressing financial risk concerns via marketing and public relations campaigns.
In: Journal of hospitality marketing & management, Band 33, Heft 3, S. 360-383
ISSN: 1936-8631
In: Journal of hospitality marketing & management, Band 31, Heft 6, S. 688-709
ISSN: 1936-8631
In: Journal of hospitality marketing & management, Band 30, Heft 7, S. 785-798
ISSN: 1936-8631
In: Environmental science and pollution research: ESPR, Band 23, Heft 21, S. 21703-21711
ISSN: 1614-7499
In: Waste management: international journal of integrated waste management, science and technology, Band 19, Heft 5, S. 333-338
ISSN: 1879-2456
In: info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.2147/CIA.S59835
Mehmet Fatih Korkmaz,1 Mehmet Nuri Erdem,2 Zeliha Disli,3 Engin Burak Selcuk,4 Mustafa Karakaplan,1 Abdullah Gogus5 1Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Inonu University School of Medicine, Malatya, Turkey; 2Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Nisantasi University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey; 3Department of Anesthesiology, Malatya Government Hospital, Malatya, Turkey; 4Department of Family Medicine, Inonu University School of Medicine, Malatya, Turkey; 5Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Florence Nightingale Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey Purpose: In this study, we aimed to report the results of a retrospective study carried out at our institute regarding cases of patients who had suffered proximal femoral fractures between January 2002 and February 2007, and who were treated with a proximal femoral nail. Materials and methods: One hundred consecutive cases were included in the study. A case documentation form was used to obtain intraoperative data including age, sex, mechanism of injury, type of fracture according to Association for Osteosynthesis/Association for the Study of Internal Fixation (AO/ASIF) classification and the American Society of Anesthesiologists' (ASA) physical status classification (ASA grade). Clinical and radiographic examinations were performed at the time of admission and at the 6th week; subsequent visits were organized on the 3rd month, 6th month, and 12th month, and in patients with longer follow-up and annually postoperatively. The Harris score of hip function was used, and any change in the position of the implants and the progress of the fracture union, which was determined radiologically, was noted. Results: The mean age of the patients was 77.66 years (range: 37–98 years), and the sex distribution was 32 males and 68 females. Seventy-three fractures were reduced by closed means, whereas 27 needed limited open reduction. The mean follow-up time for the study group was 31.3 months (range: 12–75 months). Postoperative radiographs showed a near-anatomical fracture reduction in 78% of patients. The Harris hip score was negatively correlated with the ASA score and patient age. No cases of implant failure were observed. Three patients died before discharge (one due to pulmonary embolism, two due to cardiac arrest), and five patients died due to unrelated medical conditions within the first 3 months of the follow-up. Conclusion: Our study showed that proximal femoral nail is a reliable fixation with good fracture union, and it is not associated with major complications in any type of trochanteric femoral fracture. Keywords: ASA, femoral fracture, Harris score, proximal femoral nail
BASE