Suchergebnisse

Abstract. Contributions to social capital, risk awareness, and preparedness constitute the parameters against which applications of digital technologies in the field of disaster risk management should be tested. We propose here an evaluation of four of these: mobile positioning data, social media crowdsourcing, drones, and satellite imaging, with an additional focus on acceptability and feasibility. The assessment is carried out through a survey disseminated among stakeholders. The frame of the analysis also grants the opportunity to investigate to what extent different methodologies to aggregate and evaluate the results, i.e., the Criteria Importance Through Criteria Correlation (CRITIC) model, the (Euclidean)-distance Criteria Importance Through Criteria Correlation (dCRITIC) model, the entropy model, the mean weight model, and the standard deviation model, may influence the preference of one technology over the others. We find that the different assumptions on which these methodologies rely deliver diverging results. We therefore recommend that future research adopt a sensitivity analysis that considers multiple and alternatives methods to evaluate survey results.

Climate change is recognized today not just as a pressing and prominent issue on government agendas but also one that has been increasingly 'securitized' in a variety of national and global settings. We know little, however, if climate change adaptation, as a subset of climate action, has followed a similarly securitized path. This article addresses that question, exploring not only if climate change adaptation has been securitized but also what type of securitization – threat-oriented or risk-oriented – has emerged. Turning our empirical focus to three national settings of Norway, Sweden, and The Netherlands, we look for signs of securitization as well as whether securitization has been facilitated, shaped, or even blocked by existing governance features in each setting. We use this study to link the securitization literature with environmental governance approaches by building a novel analytical framework. Our findings show some intriguing and unexpected patterns, including evidence of risk-oriented securitization couched nevertheless as 'business as usual'. We contribute to the growing debate on securitization in environmental governance while also casting new light on national climate change adaptation processes.