Suchergebnisse

Since 2015, China's economic performance has initially exhibited characteristics with enhancing quality and increasing efficiency in economic new normal. This article, based on economic operation status since 2015 under the logical framework of economic development with "recognizing the new normal, adapting the new normal, guiding the new normal and exploring the new normal," aims at commenting on and forecasting for China's current and recent macroeconomic development from the following ten perspectives of economic growth, indigenous innovation, industrial structure, ecological environment, regional coordination, people's livelihood improvement, mixed ownership, financial development and coordination between market and government.

Kibbutz is a social organization established on the principle of equality, public ownership, and voluntariness. Based on the principle of state ownership of land, collective ownership of means of production, and democratic management, such social organization implements the system of from each according to his ability, to each according to his need and distribution based on one's performance. Kibbutz is a socialist economic organization based on collective ownership, in which all members are totally equal. It has been more than 100 years since such organization was first established, in which some reforms were implemented. Kibbutz is a successful socialist economic organization based on collective ownership, and its experiences worth attention from intellectual circles and learning by various countries around the world.

Gross Domestic Product (GDP) has long been the most widely used measure of the national economy. The pursuit of economic growth exacts too high a toll in every country. Therefore,
it is theoretically and practically significant to propose and establish a new index to measure the growth of national welfare—the "Gross Domestic Product of
Welfare" (GDPW).

Socialism passes through three stages, which capture the qualitative transformation of the relations of production caused by changes in the productive forces. Specifically, the primary stage = public ownership as central (private ownership as supplement) + market-based distribution according to labor as central (distribution according to capital as supplement) + state(plan-) dominated market economy. The intermediate stage = multiple forms of public ownership + multiple commodity-type distribution according to labor + state-dominated planned economy (market adjustment as supplement). Finally, advanced socialism = singleform public ownership by entire society + product-based distribution according to labor + complete planned economy. Communism = single-form public ownership by entire society + product-based distribution according to need + fully planned economy. By contrast, the modern capitalist economic system = private ownership + distribution according to capital + state-directed market economy. This new theory of the three stages of socialism reasonably coordinates the various systemic criteria in the Marxist classics, and helps reveal the inherent connection between the primary stage of socialism and the great systemic goal of communism.

This article first sets forward the multiple connotations, diversity, and holism of Marxism, with the stress on a correct understanding of the meaning of Sinicized Marxism. Based on objective facts and statistical data, it then explains the two economic miracles now incorporated into the Constitution, namely, the great economic achievements registered under the guidance of Mao Zedong Thought and the still greater economic achievements under the theoretical guidance of socialism with Chinese characteristics. The article then elaborates on the economic component of Xi Jinping Thought on Socialism with Chinese Characteristics for a New Era, and the new ideas on productive forces and the economic system. It concludes by pointing out that in the new era, China's economy has attained a "quasi-center" status, and is drawing close to the countries at the "center." In this process, the idea that Chinese socialism has nothing to do with Marxism is a clearly ungrounded assertion that reflects an inadequate understanding both of Marx's conception of history, and of the challenges facing the Chinese people.