Gasan Guseinov. Iazyk moi – Wrack moi: Khronika ot Romula do Leninopada. Kyiv: Laurus, 2017
In: Laboratorium: žurnal socialʹnych issledovanij = Laboratorium : Russian review of social research, Band 10, Heft 2, S. 177-180
ISSN: 2078-1938
4 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Laboratorium: žurnal socialʹnych issledovanij = Laboratorium : Russian review of social research, Band 10, Heft 2, S. 177-180
ISSN: 2078-1938
In: Laboratorium: žurnal socialʹnych issledovanij = Laboratorium : Russian review of social research, Band 11, Heft 2
ISSN: 2078-1938
In: The soviet and post-soviet review, Band 46, Heft 2, S. 211-236
ISSN: 1876-3324
This article contributes to the growing body of research on the increasing role of judicial systems in regulating politics and religion ('judicialization of politics and religion') across the globe. By examining how academic expertise is deployed in anti-extremist litigation involving Russia's minority religions, this article reveals important processes involved in this judicial regulation, in particular when legal and academic institutions lack autonomy and consistency of operation. It focuses on the selection of experts and the validation of their opinion within Russia's academia and the judiciary, and identifies patterns in the experts' approach to evidence and how they validate their conclusions in the eyes of the judiciary. Academic expertise provides an aura of legitimacy to judicial decisions in which anti-extremist legislation is used as a means to control unpopular minority religions and to regulate Russia's religious diversity. As one of the few systematic explorations of this subject and the first focused on Russia, this article reveals important processes that produce religious discrimination and the role that anti-extremist legislation plays in these processes.
In: Shterin , M & Dubrovsky , D 2019 , ' Academic Expertise and Anti-Extremism Litigation in Russia : Focusing on Minority Religions ' , The Soviet and Post-Soviet Review , vol. 46 , no. 2 , pp. 211-236 . https://doi.org/10.1163/18763324-04602006
This article contributes to the growing body of research on the increasing role of judicial systems in regulating politics and religion ('judicialization of politics and religion') across the globe. By examining how academic expertise is deployed in anti-extremist litigation involving Russia's minority religions, this article reveals important processes involved in this judicial regulation, in particular when legal and academic institutions lack autonomy and consistency of operation. It focuses on the selection of experts and the validation of their opinion within Russia's academia and the judiciary, and identifies patterns in the experts' approach to evidence and how they validate their conclusions in the eyes of the judiciary. Academic expertise provides an aura of legitimacy to judicial decisions in which anti-extremist legislation is used as a means to control unpopular minority religions and to regulate Russia's religious diversity. As one of the few systematic explorations of this subject and the first focused on Russia, this article reveals important processes that produce religious discrimination and the role that anti-extremist legislation plays in these processes.
BASE