Mitigating the new Cold War: managing US-China trade, tech and geopolitical conflict
In: Analysis paper 8
60 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Analysis paper 8
In: Working paper 374
In: Cambridge Asia-Pacific studies
In: Australia-Asian paper 58
In: The national interest, Heft 119, S. 55-61
ISSN: 0884-9382
World Affairs Online
Australian governments of both political persuasions have been embroiled in controversies over military cooperation with Indonesia since bilateral defence relations first began to gather steam under the Keating Labor government in the early 1990s. Prime Minister Paul Keating and Foreign Minister Gareth Evans were enthusiastic proponents of building strong ties with Indonesia, a policy which was extended to the military sphere with the establishment of two high level committees to coordinate and develop defence cooperation in 1994 (Ball and Kerr, 1996:70). These committees were later incorporated into an expanded defence agreement by the newly elected Howard Government in 1996, leading to the establishment of five working groups covering logistics, science and technology, communications, interoperability, education, training and exchanges (Walters, 1996:3).
BASE
Australian governments of both political persuasions have been embroiled in controversies over military cooperation with Indonesia since bilateral defence relations first began to gather steam under the Keating Labor government in the early 1990s. Prime Minister Paul Keating and Foreign Minister Gareth Evans were enthusiastic proponents of building strong ties with Indonesia, a policy which was extended to the military sphere with the establishment of two high level committees to coordinate and develop defence cooperation in 1994 (Ball and Kerr, 1996:70). These committees were later incorporated into an expanded defence agreement by the newly elected Howard Government in 1996, leading to the establishment of five working groups covering logistics, science and technology, communications, interoperability, education, training and exchanges (Walters, 1996:3).
BASE
In: Survival: global politics and strategy, Band 50, Heft 3, S. 29-54
ISSN: 1468-2699
In: Survival: global politics and strategy, Band 50, Heft 3, S. 29-54
ISSN: 0039-6338
In: Survival: global politics and strategy
ISSN: 0039-6338
Climate change of the magnitude and time frames projected by the world's leading climate scientists poses fundamental questions of human security, survival and the stability of nation states. While state weakness and destabilising internal conflicts are a more likely outcome than inter-state war, climate change will be a stress multiplier for all nations and societies, especially those already at risk from ethnic and religious conflicts, economic weakness and environmental degradation. Prudence and sensible risk management suggest that policymakers need to take this issue far more seriously. And strategic planners ought to include worst-case climate-change scenarios in their contingency planning, as climate change is set to rank with terrorism, pandemic diseases and major war as one of the principle challenges to security in the twenty-first century. (Survival / SWP)
World Affairs Online
In: The national interest, Heft 79, S. 43-51
ISSN: 0884-9382
World Affairs Online
In: Intelligence and national security, Band 18, Heft 4, S. 15-39
ISSN: 1743-9019
In: Australian journal of international affairs: journal of the Australian Institute of International Affairs, Band 57, Heft 1, S. 55-76
ISSN: 1465-332X
In: Intelligence and national security, Band 18, Heft 4, S. 15-39
ISSN: 0268-4527