Sociological studies of diffusion: is history relevant?
In: Socio-economic review, Band 6, Heft 3, S. 538-557
ISSN: 1475-147X
4 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Socio-economic review, Band 6, Heft 3, S. 538-557
ISSN: 1475-147X
In: Socio-economic review, Band 2, Heft 3, S. 341-370
ISSN: 1475-147X
In: Kourula , A E , Moon , J , Salles-Djelic , M L & Wickert , C M J 2019 , ' New roles of government in the governance of business conduct: Implications for management and organizational research ' , Organization Studies , vol. 40 , no. 8 , pp. 1101-1123 . https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840619852142
In this introductory paper for the special issue "Government and the Governance of Business Conduct: Implications for Management and Organization", we focus on government as an institution in the broader context of the governance of business conduct. We review the longevity and heterogeneity of governmental actors along with, and in relation to, the evolving role and place of business and civil society actors under the double challenge of privatization and globalization over the last three to four decades. In so doing we track the evolution of government's primary governance roles. We suggest that part of the organization and management scholarship builds upon problematic assumptions when it comes to the role(s) of government in the governance of business conduct. We suggest that while governments might be losing some power, they are also acquiring and deploying it in other areas; that governments are taking on new governance roles in relation to business conduct; that government regulation may contribute positively to the governance of business conduct; and that government is an ever-important focus for management and organizational research. We show how the six contributing papers to the Special Issue both illustrate these arguments and reveal new roles for government in the contemporary governance of business conduct. We end by proposing a research agenda for the further exploration of government in governance.
BASE
A number of regulatory initiatives on the national, international and EU levels both foster and fortify the principle of Maximizing Shareholder Value (MSV) in corporate governance. This tendency can be clearly seen in such areas as financial accounting standards and various soft and hard law initiatives pertaining to corporate governance that have flourished in recent decades. These have created a new type of accountability for managers of listed corporations as will be exemplified below. One of the most important regulatory changes over this period was when the EU opted for International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) as a basis for financial reporting for the accounts of all listed, EU-based corporations in 2005. These accounting standards, amounting to quasi legislation, are issued by a private sector body – the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB). Other important regulatory changes include the various national 'corporate governance codes' that have mushroomed since the early 1990s. Although such codes pertain to member states, the EU remains the main body prescribing most new hard-law corporate governance regulation within the union, for example, by means of the 13 company law directives issued so far.
BASE