Suchergebnisse
Filter
11 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
SSRN
Working paper
Endogenous emergence of credit markets: Contracting in response to a new technology in Ghana
In: Journal of development economics, Band 101, S. 268-283
ISSN: 0304-3878
Endogenous emergence of credit markets: contracting in response to a new technology in Ghana
In: Journal of development economics
ISSN: 0304-3878
World Affairs Online
Statistical Discrimination and the Distribution of Wages
In: NBER Working Paper No. w32562
SSRN
SSRN
Working paper
Evaluating Strategic Forecasters
In: American Economic Review, 108(10), 3057-3103 (2018)
SSRN
Working paper
(Bad) reputation in relational contracting
Motivated by markets for "expertise," we study a bandit model where a principal chooses between a safe and risky arm. A strategic agent controls the risky arm and privately knows whether its type is high or low. Irrespective of type, the agent wants to maximize duration of experimentation with the risky arm. However, only the high type arm can generate value for the principal. Our main insight is that reputational incentives can be exceedingly strong unless both players coordinate on maximally inefficient strategies on path. We discuss implications for online content markets, term limits for politicians, and experts in organizations.
BASE
(Bad) Reputation in Relational Contracting
In: CEPR Discussion Paper No. DP14408
SSRN
Working paper
Evaluating Strategic Forecasters
In: American economic review, Band 108, Heft 10, S. 3057-3103
ISSN: 1944-7981
Motivated by the question of how one should evaluate professional election forecasters, we study a novel dynamic mechanism design problem without transfers. A principal who wishes to hire only high-quality forecasters is faced with an agent of unknown quality. The agent privately observes signals about a publicly observable future event, and may strategically misrepresent information to inflate the principal's perception of his quality. We show that the optimal deterministic mechanism is simple and easy to implement in practice: it evaluates a single, optimally timed prediction. We study the generality of this result and its robustness to randomization and noncommitment. (JEL C53, D72, D82)
Testing Alone Is Insufficient
SSRN
Working paper
Testing Motives for Charitable Giving: A Revealed-Preference Methodology with Experimental Evidence
In: NBER Working Paper No. w18029
SSRN