Suchergebnisse

A delegation of Russian senators led by Russian Federation Council Speaker Valentina Matviyenko paid an official visit to Laos and China on Sep 19-Sep 23, 2014. The visit came as a logical continuation of Russia's multilevel dialogue with its Asian partners. Davydenko discusses why the Asia-Pacific region is high on the list of Russia's foreign policy priorities. Adapted from the source document.

Davydenko discusses the highlights of the 'Bulgaria-Russia. 135 years of Diplomatic Relations: Past, Present and Future' conference which was held at the National Palace of Culture in Sofia Bulgaria. In the participants' view, the conference was a significant event for academics in both countries. The broad format of this authoritative gathering of experts provided diplomats and politicians with many valuable ideas and an opportunity to discuss further development of the bilateral and European agendas. Adapted from the source document.

The 21st Annual Meeting of the Asia Pacific Parliamentary Forum (APPR), which took place in Vladivostok on Russky Island on January 27-31, 2013, has become the most representative meeting in the entire history of this international parliamentary organization, ending with the adoption of 14 resolutions on key issues of political, trade, economic, and humanitarian cooperation of the Asia-Pacific states. Adapted from the source document.

The December 2010 issue of Negocios Estrangeiros carried a detailed analytical forecast by Joao Fabio Bertonha, professor of history at the State University of Maringa (Brazil). The very title of Bertonha's article "The End of American Hegemony in South America? Russia, China and the European Union -- New Regional Players?" speaks for itself. The Brazilian historian has provided answers to these questions. Adapted from the source document.

The article considers the main directions for the development of mediation procedure in Ukraine in accordance with the current legislation and its development prospects in administrative law. The current state of mediation in Ukraine and the experience of previous implementation of this procedure were outlined. Scientific papers of domestic scientists were studied, independent ways of mediation development as a category of legal relations were identified. Currently, the status of a mediator is determined, including the Draft Law: "On mediation" and its basic provisions are considered. Disputed aspects of the current legislation, namely problems of introduction of mediation and possible ways for improving the Draft Law of Ukraine: "On mediation" were analyzed. The list of problems for introducing mediation into administrative law were defined, which is suggested to be divided into three groups: general, administratively oriented, technical. Common problems are conditioned by conceptual problems of mediation introduction, administratively oriented: provide impossibility of the development of alternative ways for solving disputes in administrative law, and technical: gaps in legislation concerning procedural aspects of carrying out mediation. Recommendations are also given on ways to overcome these problems, which will facilitate a gradual transition to mediation as an alternative way of settling disputes. As the main recommendation phased implementation of the Law of Ukraine: "On mediation" is suggested. Transition to each stage involves reducing court involvement in mediation procedures and further allocating it in independent system of alternative dispute resolution. Foreign experience of mediation was considered which is taken into account in the current practice of disputes peaceful settlement and confirms the need to implement the proposed recommendations. ; Розглянуто основні напрями розвитку процедури медіації в Україні відповідно до чинного законодавства та її перспективи в адміністративному процесі. Схарактеризовано наявний стан медіації в Україні. Досліджено спірні аспекти чинного законодавства, зокрема напрями вдосконалення проєкту Закону України «Про медіацію». Визначено перелік проблем введення медіації в адміністративному процесі, які розподілено на групи. Надано рекомендації щодо шляхів подолання цих проблем, що сприятиме поступовому переходу до медіації як альтернативного способу розв'язання спорів. Визначено аспекти впливу «узаконеної» медіації на діяльність судового експерта як учасника судового розгляду. Розглянуто закордонний досвід медіації, який слід брати до уваги в сучасній практиці мирного врегулювання спорів.