Suchergebnisse

Hopes the conduct of his son (William Edings) is good; allow his son to visit friends during the vacation. ; Transcription by Joseph Byrne. Transcriptions may be subject to error. Writer's residence noted as Edingsville.

His son, William Edings, returns to the Academy; also sends another son (Benjamin Edings) to the Academy; discusses expenses. ; Transcription by Joseph Byrne. Transcriptions may be subject to error.

The United States of America and Canada have a strong bilateral relationship that spans trade and national security concerns made necessary by their geographic proximity to one another. However, this is not one that equally impacts both states. This article maps out how marketization and securitization as dual forces shape much of Canada's immigration policy framework. This framework is in response to American post-9/11 national security discourses which resulted in the reification of racial discrimination at the border (Crocker et al. 2007). It will do so by grounding these arguments in a theoretical framework that critically examines neoliberalism as the context in which 'biopolitics of citizenship' at the border emerge which further constrains the mobility of racial others across the Canada-USA border (Sparke 2006). While Canada has always been framed as a safe harbor for freed slaves, we shall discuss how Black bodies have always been marked as out of place and other at the border as early as the eighteenth century through surveillance and biometric technologies like the Book of Negroes (Browne 2015). Special attention shall be brought to bear on policy documents, legislation, and agreements like the North American Free Trade Agreement, Canada's Anti-Terrorism Act, and the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act. This attention will situate these discussions within a regulatory framework that continues to mark racialized migrant bodies at this border site as out of place, weakening Canada's ability to articulate a truly emancipatory vision of multiculturalism.