Dealing with Potential Terrorists within a Censure-based Model of Sentencing
In: in A. du Bois-Pedain & A. Bottoms (eds.), Penal Censure: Engagements Within and Beyond Desert Theory (2019, Hart Publishing), pp. 161-183.
8 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: in A. du Bois-Pedain & A. Bottoms (eds.), Penal Censure: Engagements Within and Beyond Desert Theory (2019, Hart Publishing), pp. 161-183.
SSRN
Working paper
In: 45 Crime and Justice: A Review of Research 107-173 (2016)
SSRN
Working paper
In: 60 Howard Law Journal 1-60 (2016)
SSRN
In: Corda , A & Lageson , S E 2020 , ' Disordered Punishment: Workaround Technologies of Criminal Records Disclosure and the Rise of a New Penal Entrepreneurialism ' , British Journal of Criminology , vol. 60 , no. 2 , pp. 245-264 . https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azz039
The privatization of punishment is a well-established phenomenon in modern criminal justice operations. Less understood are the market and technological forces that have dramatically reshaped the creation and sharing of criminal record data in recent years. Analysing trends in both the United States and Europe, we argue that this massive shift is cause to reconceptualize theories of penal entrepreneurialism to more directly address the role of technology and commercial interests. Criminal records, or proxies for them, are now actively produced and managed by third parties via corporate decision-making processes, rather than government dictating boundaries or outsourcing duties to private actors. This has led to what we term 'disordered punishment', imposed unevenly and inconsistently across multiple platforms, increasingly difficult for both government and individuals to control.
BASE
In: The British journal of criminology, Band 60, Heft 2, S. 245-264
ISSN: 1464-3529
AbstractThe privatization of punishment is a well-established phenomenon in modern criminal justice operations. Less understood are the market and technological forces that have dramatically reshaped the creation and sharing of criminal record data in recent years. Analysing trends in both the United States and Europe, we argue that this massive shift is cause to reconceptualize theories of penal entrepreneurialism to more directly address the role of technology and commercial interests. Criminal records, or proxies for them, are now actively produced and managed by third parties via corporate decision-making processes, rather than government dictating boundaries or outsourcing duties to private actors. This has led to what we term 'disordered punishment', imposed unevenly and inconsistently across multiple platforms, increasingly difficult for both government and individuals to control.
In: British Journal of Criminology, Forthcoming
SSRN
In: APPA-PERSPECTIVES, Spring 2017, pp. 20-27
SSRN
Working paper
In: in American Exceptionalism in Crime and Punishment (Kevin R. Reitz ed., Oxford University Press 2018) (with Dirk van Zyl Smit), pp. 410-486.
SSRN