Polarity in International Relations: past, present, future
In: International affairs, Band 99, Heft 2, S. 837-838
ISSN: 1468-2346
43 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: International affairs, Band 99, Heft 2, S. 837-838
ISSN: 1468-2346
In: International politics: a journal of transnational issues and global problems
ISSN: 1740-3898
In: Journal of common market studies: JCMS, Band 61, Heft 1, S. 277-278
ISSN: 1468-5965
In: Defence studies, Band 22, Heft 4, S. 624-643
ISSN: 1743-9698
In: Defence studies, Band 23, Heft 1, S. 148-150
ISSN: 1743-9698
In: International affairs, Band 98, Heft 5, S. 1790-1792
ISSN: 1468-2346
In: Journal of common market studies: JCMS, Band 60, Heft 5, S. 1529-1530
ISSN: 1468-5965
In: Journal of common market studies: JCMS, Band 60, Heft 4, S. 1211-1212
ISSN: 1468-5965
In: Journal of common market studies: JCMS, Band 60, Heft 1, S. 224-225
ISSN: 1468-5965
In: Defence studies, Band 22, Heft 2, S. 295-297
ISSN: 1743-9698
In: Defence studies, Band 22, Heft 1, S. 138-140
ISSN: 1743-9698
In: Defence studies, Band 21, Heft 2, S. 266-268
ISSN: 1743-9698
In: International politics: a journal of transnational issues and global problems, Band 58, Heft 6, S. 919-936
ISSN: 1740-3898
In: Parliamentary affairs: a journal of comparative politics, Band 75, Heft 1, S. 174-194
ISSN: 1460-2482
The royal prerogative is one of the most significant elements of the UK's government and constitution. During the premiership of Gordon Brown and the Conservative-Liberal Democrat coalition led by David Cameron, there was momentum for a reform of the royal prerogative. During the Conservative premiership of Theresa May, the impetus for reform of the royal prerogative has seemingly diminished. This article analyses how the UK Government has made use of the royal prerogative in terms of deploying the armed forces, making and unmaking international treaties and proroguing Parliament. It asserts that while such powers have not been compromised, the ability of Prime Ministers to use them without parliamentary consent has been subject to greater contestation. This has appeared to rein in the discretion of Prime Ministers. However, this article argues that Prime Ministers' discretion has in fact become more meaningful as their political capital is invested in decisions concerning prerogative powers.
In: Defence studies, Band 21, Heft 1, S. 122-125
ISSN: 1743-9698