Differences in livelihoods, socioeconomic characteristics, and knowledge about the sea between fishers and non-fishers living near and far from marine parks on the Kenyan coast
In: Marine policy, Band 34, Heft 1, S. 22-28
ISSN: 0308-597X
10 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Marine policy, Band 34, Heft 1, S. 22-28
ISSN: 0308-597X
In: Marine policy: the international journal of ocean affairs, Band 34, Heft 1, S. 22-29
ISSN: 0308-597X
In: Marine policy: the international journal of ocean affairs, Band 34, Heft 1, S. 7-22
ISSN: 0308-597X
In: Marine policy, Band 36, Heft 2, S. 481-488
ISSN: 0308-597X
In: Marine policy: the international journal of ocean affairs, Band 36, Heft 2, S. 481-489
ISSN: 0308-597X
In: Marine policy: the international journal of ocean affairs, Band 36, Heft 1, S. 278-286
ISSN: 0308-597X
In: Marine policy, Band 36, Heft 1, S. 278-285
ISSN: 0308-597X
In: Environmental science & policy, Band 61, S. 212-220
ISSN: 1462-9011
Vegetated coastal ecosystems provide goods and services to billions of people. In the aftermath of a series of recent natural disasters, including the Indian Ocean Tsunami, Hurricane Katrina and Cyclone Nargis, coastal vegetation has been widely promoted for the purpose of reducing the impact of large storm surges and tsunami. In this paper, we review the use of coastal vegetation as a "bioshield" against these extreme events. Our objective is to alter bioshield policy and reduce the long-term negative consequences for biodiversity and human capital. We begin with an overview of the scientific literature, in particular focusing on studies published since the Indian Ocean Tsunami in 2004 and discuss the science of wave attenuation by vegetation. We then explore case studies from the Indian subcontinent and evaluate the detrimental impacts bioshield plantations can have upon native ecosystems, drawing a distinction between coastal restoration and the introduction of exotic species in inappropriate locations. Finally, we place bioshield policies into a political context, and outline a new direction for coastal vegetation policy and research.
BASE
Marine protected areas (MPAs) are a primary policy instrument for managing and protecting coral reefs. Successful MPAs ultimately depend on knowledge-based decision making, where scientific research is integrated into management actions. Fourteen coral reef MPA managers and sixteen academics from eleven research, state and federal government institutions each outlined at least five pertinent research needs for improving the management of MPAs situated in Australian coral reefs. From this list of 173 key questions, we asked members of each group to rank questions in order of urgency, redundancy and importance, which allowed us to explore the extent of perceptional mismatch and overlap among the two groups. Our results suggest the mismatch among MPA managers and academics is small, with no significant difference among the groups in terms of their respective research interests, or the type of questions they pose. However, managers prioritised spatial management and monitoring as research themes, whilst academics identified climate change, resilience, spatial management, fishing and connectivity as the most important topics. Ranking of the posed questions by the two groups was also similar, although managers were less confident about the achievability of the posed research questions and whether questions represented a knowledge gap. We conclude that improved collaboration and knowledge transfer among management and academic groups can be used to achieve similar objectives and enhance the knowledge-based management of MPAs.
BASE