The Truth in Fake News: How Disinformation Laws Are Reframing the Concepts of Truth and Accuracy on Digital Platforms
In: Edinburgh School of Law Research Paper No. 2022/12
13 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Edinburgh School of Law Research Paper No. 2022/12
SSRN
In: Edinburgh School of Law Research Paper No. 2020/01
SSRN
Working paper
In: Journal of Digital Media & Policy, vol. 12 Issue 3 407-423
SSRN
In: (2019) European Data Protection Law Review 5(4):573 – 578
SSRN
Working paper
In: Edinburgh School of Law Research Paper No. 2019/29
SSRN
Working paper
In: In: A. Torre (cur.), Il Regno è ancora Unito? Saggi e commenti sul referendum scozzese del 18 settembre 2014, Maggioli editore 2016, pp. 281-295.
SSRN
In: Journal of legal pluralism and unofficial law: JLP, Band 47, Heft 1, S. 56-75
ISSN: 2305-9931
In: Originally presented at the international conference Evaluation in the Media (Assemblée Nationale, Paris, March 15-16, 2012).
SSRN
In: Int. J. Public Law and Policy, Band 2, Heft 4
SSRN
In: in G.L. Falchi, A. Iaccarino (curr.), Legittimazione e limiti degli ordinamenti giuridici, Lateran U.P., pp. 683-708, 2012
SSRN
In: Diritto pubblico comparato ed europeo, 2008/2, 921-927
SSRN
In: European journal of risk regulation: EJRR ; at the intersection of global law, science and policy, Band 13, Heft 3, S. 421-442
ISSN: 2190-8249
AbstractUnder what conditions can artificial intelligence contribute to political processes without undermining their legitimacy? Thanks to the ever-growing availability of data and the increasing power of decision-making algorithms, the future of political institutions is unlikely to be anything similar to what we have known throughout the last century, possibly with parliaments deprived of their traditional authority and public decision-making processes largely unaccountable. This paper discusses and challenges these concerns by suggesting a theoretical framework under which algorithmic decision-making is compatible with democracy and, most relevantly, can offer a viable solution to counter the rise of populist rhetoric in the governance arena. Such a framework is based on three pillars: (1) understanding the civic issues that are subjected to automated decision-making; (2) controlling the issues that are assigned to AI; and (3) evaluating and challenging the outputs of algorithmic decision-making.
In: Edinburgh School of Law Research Paper No. 2022/01
SSRN