Suchergebnisse

This article examines the initial effect of Affordable Care Act (ACA) Health Insurance Marketplace (Exchange) insurance on access to care among employed beneficiaries in a highly populated US state. Does Exchange insurance lead to better/worse health care access for employed beneficiaries, compared with similar individuals covered through standard employer-sponsored insurance (ESI) coverage? This retrospective study uses data from the 2015 Ohio Medicaid Assessment Survey, a dual-frame and computer-assisted telephone survey administered by the Ohio Colleges of Medicine Graduate Resource Center, the Ohio Department of Medicaid, the Ohio Department of Health, and Ohio State University, in conjunction with RTI International. This study examines a sub-sample of employed adults (age 18-64) covered by either an Exchange plan or ESI, extracted from the full sample of n = 42 876. We use linear propensity score matching using Euclidean distance to balance treatment groups and logistic regression models to estimate the treatment effect of Exchange coverage on all outcome variables. McNemar tests, Rosenbaum sensitivity analysis, and Benjamini-Hochberg procedure adjustments are also conducted. Compared with ESI insurance, Exchange insurance has no significant effect on outcomes measuring either perceived access to care or, more specifically, perceived financial barriers to accessing care. Exchange plan viability remains a hot topic of debate across the United States, given the potential repeal of the individual mandate. We use risk-adjustment methods to demonstrate that Exchange plan beneficiaries do not experience worse access to care than ESI beneficiaries. That said, several key limitations are discussed.

BACKGROUND: Children's physical activity (PA) is an important guarantee for children's physical and mental health. Influencing factors of children's PA in family is related to the healthy growth of children and the happy life of families. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional study of influencing factors of children's PA in family. Parents whose children in 15 kindergartens(i.e., children are aged from 3 to 6 years) were sampled. RESULTS: Government had a significant negative impact on parents' perceived risks. Community has a significant positive effect on parents' perceived benefits and a significant negative effect on parents' perceived risks. Kindergarten has a significant positive effect on parents' perceived benefits, but has no significant effect on the parents' perceived risks. Children sports club has a significant positive effect on parents' perceived benefits. Parents' perceived benefits has a significant positive impact on children's PA in family, while perceived risks has a significant negative impact. CONCLUSION: Government should play a leading role in the development of children's PA in family. Community provides supplementary support. Kindergarten is the key point of developing children's PA in family. Children sports club is the auxiliary force of children's PA in family.