Democracy and Territorial Change
In: The Korean journal of international studies, Band 20, Heft 1, S. 1-19
ISSN: 2288-5072
20 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: The Korean journal of international studies, Band 20, Heft 1, S. 1-19
ISSN: 2288-5072
In: Security studies, Band 21, Heft 4, S. 624-653
ISSN: 1556-1852
In: Security studies, Band 21, Heft 4, S. 624-653
ISSN: 0963-6412
World Affairs Online
In: The Korean journal of defense analysis, Band 20, Heft 3, S. 247-261
ISSN: 1941-4641
In: International studies quarterly: the journal of the International Studies Association, Band 48, Heft 3, S. 663-682
ISSN: 1468-2478
In: International studies quarterly: the journal of the International Studies Association, Band 48, Heft 3, S. 663-682
ISSN: 0020-8833, 1079-1760
World Affairs Online
In: Korean Journal of International Relations, Band 43, Heft 5, S. 141-157
ISSN: 2713-6868
In: International security, Band 28, Heft 1, S. 142-153
ISSN: 1531-4804
In: International affairs, Band 79, Heft 1, S. 173-175
ISSN: 0020-5850
In: International affairs, Band 79, Heft 5, S. 1085-1086
ISSN: 0020-5850
In: International security, Band 28, Heft 1, S. 142-153
ISSN: 0162-2889
World Affairs Online
Current developments in Northeast Asia underscore the importance of recent efforts by Australia and South Korea to develop independent security ties. Understanding the rationales and selected benchmarks in Australian-ROK politico-security relations is important to reaching a meaningful assessment of how they could affect regional and international security. The "common wisdom" that the two countries' distance from each other, and that their disparate historical and cultural backgrounds complicate the development of bilateral politico-security ties is contested here. A major challenge that both these "middle powers" will face will be to reconcile their alliances with the United States with their growing economic and political relations with China, particularly in the context of responding to future strategic contingencies on the Korean peninsula.
BASE
Current developments in Northeast Asia underscore the importance of recent efforts by Australia and South Korea to develop independent security ties. Understanding the rationales and selected benchmarks in Australian-ROK politico-security relations is important to reaching a meaningful assessment of how they could affect regional and international security. The "common wisdom" that the two countries' distance from each other, and that their disparate historical and cultural backgrounds complicate the development of bilateral politico-security ties is contested here. A major challenge that both these "middle powers" will face will be to reconcile their alliances with the United States with their growing economic and political relations with China, particularly in the context of responding to future strategic contingencies on the Korean peninsula.
BASE
In: The Pacific review, Band 25, Heft 2, S. 269-292
ISSN: 1470-1332
In: The Pacific review, Band 25, Heft 2, S. 269-292
ISSN: 0951-2748
Despite many predictions to the contrary, the Republic of Korea (ROK) is currently one of the countries with most pro-American attitudes. We investigate what is behind the extraordinary resilience in US popular standing in an allegedly least likely setting. Using survey data from 2002 and 2007 and a novel methodology, Classification and Regression Tree models, we test whether US standing is: (1) a matter of interests, i.e. a reward that the USA receives because it either provides security or international public goods; or (2) whether it is a matter of image, i.e. the recognition that the USA is a role model to emulate. We find that across a large number of predictors, the Korean public mostly liked the USA because they liked American ways of doing business, which gives support to the image hypothesis. Security interests played a secondary role in shaping US standing, while the provision of international public goods had no impact in the popular assessment of the USA in the ROK. (Pac Rev/GIGA)
World Affairs Online