Contaminant exposure and ecotoxicological impacts in estuaries
In: Environmental science and pollution research: ESPR, Band 20, Heft 2, S. 599-600
ISSN: 1614-7499
12 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Environmental science and pollution research: ESPR, Band 20, Heft 2, S. 599-600
ISSN: 1614-7499
In: Environmental science and pollution research: ESPR, Band 24, Heft 36, S. 27662-27669
ISSN: 1614-7499
In: Environmental science and pollution research: ESPR, Band 22, Heft 11, S. 8003-8009
ISSN: 1614-7499
In: Environmental science and pollution research: ESPR, Band 21, Heft 7, S. 4940-4949
ISSN: 1614-7499
In: Environmental science and pollution research: ESPR, Band 20, Heft 5, S. 2721-2725
ISSN: 1614-7499
In: Environmental science and pollution research: ESPR, Band 21, Heft 9, S. 6108-6123
ISSN: 1614-7499
In: Environmental science and pollution research: ESPR, Band 20, Heft 2, S. 690-707
ISSN: 1614-7499
In: Environmental science and pollution research: ESPR, Band 20, Heft 2, S. 708-722
ISSN: 1614-7499
In: Environmental science and pollution research: ESPR, Band 20, Heft 2, S. 723-737
ISSN: 1614-7499
In: Environmental science and pollution research: ESPR, Band 20, Heft 2, S. 630-650
ISSN: 1614-7499
In: Environmental science and pollution research: ESPR, Band 31, Heft 5, S. 6587-6596
ISSN: 1614-7499
Many maritime countries in Europe have implemented marine environmental monitoring programmes which include the measurement of chemical contaminants and related biological effects. How best to integrate data obtained in these two types of monitoring into meaningful assessments has been the subject of recent efforts by the International Council for Exploration of the Sea (ICES) Expert Groups. Work within these groups has concentrated on defining a core set of chemical and biological endpoints that can be used across maritime areas, defining confounding factors, supporting parameters and protocols for measurement. The framework comprised markers for concentrations of, exposure to and effects from, contaminants. Most importantly, assessment criteria for biological effect measurements have been set and the framework suggests how these measurements can be used in an integrated manner alongside contaminant measurements in biota, sediments and potentially water. Output from this process resulted in OSPAR Commission (www.ospar.org) guidelines that were adopted in 2012 on a trial basis for a period of 3 years. The developed assessment framework can furthermore provide a suitable approach for the assessment of Good Environmental Status (GES) for Descriptor 8 of the European Union (EU) Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD).
BASE