Suchergebnisse

Tujuan penelitian menganalisis penerapan Asas Legalitas dalam Undang-undang No. 35 Tahun 2009 terkait penjatuhan sanksi dibawah batas minimum khusus, dan; menganalisis konsekuensi hukum terhadap putusan hakim yang memutuskan perkara pidana narkotika dengan sanksi di bawah minimum. Penelitian ini menggunakan data primer dengan melakukan kajian pustaka yaitu Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana, Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana Serta Undang-Undang No. 35 tahun 2009 tentang Narkotika. Hasil Penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa: (1) Berdasarkan Asas Legalitas sebagaimana yang dimaksud di dalam Pasal 1 ayat (1) KUHP yaitu nullapoena sine lege memberikan makna bahwa setiap sanksi pidana haruslah ada peraturan hukum yang mengatur sebelumnya, sedangkan penafsiran hukum yang melahirkan penemuan hukum oleh hakim tersebut tidaklah diperlukan bilamana telah ada aturan yang secara jelas dan tegas diatur dalam peraturan perundang-undangan, agar mewujudkan tujuan hukum yakni rasa keadilan, kepastian hukum dan kemanfaatan, dan; (2) Adanya penjatuhan pidana di bawah minimum menurut penulis memberikan konsekuensi hukum yang mana bertentangan dengan asas legalitas, jika mendasarkan pada penafsiran peraturan perundang-undangan yang telah ada yang melahirkan penemuan hukum oleh hakim, yang menyebabkan tidak adanya kepastian hukum. The research objective is to analyze the application of the Legality Principle in Law no. 35 of 2009 regarding the imposition of sanctions below the special minimum limit, and; analyze the legal consequences of the judge's decision that decides on narcotics criminal cases with sanctions below the minimum. This study uses primary data by conducting a literature review, namely the Criminal Code, the Criminal Procedure Code and Law no. 35 of 2009 on Narcotics. The results of this study indicate that: (1) Based on the principle of legality as referred to in Article 1 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code, namely nullapoena sine lege, it means that every criminal sanction must have a legal regulation that regulates it beforehand, while the interpretation of the law that gives birth to legal findings by the judge is not needed if there are rules that are clearly and firmly regulated in the legislation, in order to realize the legal objectives, namely a sense of justice, legal certainty and expediency, and; (2) The existence of a criminal sentence below the minimum according to the author provides legal consequences which are contrary to the principle of legality, if it is based on the interpretation of existing laws and regulations that give birth to legal findings by judges, which causes the absence of legal certainty.

The problem of village fund management in 2015 and until 2018, the budget of village funds from the central government to South Sulawesi has reached a total of Rp.5.7 trillion spread over 2,255 villages. With that much budget, it should be a trigger for the performance of village officials to increase development as mandated by Law Number 6 of 2014 concerning Villages (Village Law. But in its development, the abundant village funds were prone to be misused. Based on ICW monitoring since from 2015 to 2018, cases of corruption in village funds have increased from year to year and there have been at least 181 cases of corruption in village funds with 184 suspects of corruption and a loss of Rp. 40.6 billion. Increasing abuse of village funds has also occurred in South Sulawesi, namely 22 cases have been recorded with state losses of 3.4 billion, so it is deemed necessary to take efforts through preemptive and preventive patterns so that misuse of village funds is not repeated in various regions, particularly in Baji Mangngai Village, Mandai District, Maros Regency. we make a legal study, as it is believed that jurisprudence ha dir in an effort to provide legal problem solving.